<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Simon Marlow wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid3429668D0E777A499EE74A7952C382D1032392E4@EUR-MSG-01.europe.corp.microsoft.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 11 February 2005 10:11, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The problem is that it has been stated several times on this thread
that there will be no leap second table, nor a way to use one. If
that's not correct, then there is no problem.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I think you've misunderstood. The plan was never to get rid of TAI
altogether; the discussion has been about whether getCurrentTime should
return TAI or something UTC-based.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes, you are correct, and I did miss that. Apologies.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid3429668D0E777A499EE74A7952C382D1032392E4@EUR-MSG-01.europe.corp.microsoft.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
In case you missed it, here's Ashley's latest proposal, which includes
full support for TAI and leap second tables:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-February/003158.html">http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-February/003158.html</a>
Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a>
!DSPAM:420c8b46267241748010920!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>