<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Simon Marlow wrote:
<blockquote
 cite="mid3429668D0E777A499EE74A7952C382D1032392E4@EUR-MSG-01.europe.corp.microsoft.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">On 11 February 2005 10:11, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">The problem is that it has been stated several times on this thread
that there will be no leap second table, nor a way to use one.  If
that's not correct, then there is no problem.  
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
I think you've misunderstood.  The plan was never to get rid of TAI
altogether; the discussion has been about whether getCurrentTime should
return TAI or something UTC-based.
  </pre>
</blockquote>
Yes, you are correct, and I did miss that.&nbsp; Apologies.<br>
<blockquote
 cite="mid3429668D0E777A499EE74A7952C382D1032392E4@EUR-MSG-01.europe.corp.microsoft.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">
In case you missed it, here's Ashley's latest proposal, which includes
full support for TAI and leap second tables:

  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-February/003158.html">http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-February/003158.html</a>

Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a>

!DSPAM:420c8b46267241748010920!

  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>