Difference between revisions of "99 questions/Solutions/19"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
rotate l n = rotate l (length l + n)
 
rotate l n = rotate l (length l + n)
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
  +
  +
(Note that this solution uses [http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Pattern_matching#n.2Bk_patterns n+k-patterns] which are [http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/haskellli2.html#x3-5000 removed] from Haskell 2010.)
   
 
There are two separate cases:
 
There are two separate cases:
Line 18: Line 20:
 
rotate xs n = take len . drop (n `mod` len) . cycle $ xs
 
rotate xs n = take len . drop (n `mod` len) . cycle $ xs
 
where len = length xs
 
where len = length xs
  +
</haskell>
  +
  +
or without mod:
  +
<haskell>
  +
rotate xs n = take (length xs) $ drop (length xs + n) $ cycle xs
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
   
Line 30: Line 37:
   
 
or
 
or
  +
  +
<haskell>
  +
rotate xs n | n >= 0 = drop n xs ++ take n xs
  +
| n < 0 = drop len xs ++ take len xs
  +
where len = n+length xs
  +
</haskell>
   
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
Line 36: Line 49:
 
nn = n `mod` length xs
 
nn = n `mod` length xs
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
  +
  +
Using a simple splitAt trick
  +
<haskell>
  +
rotate xs n
  +
| n < 0 = rotate xs (n+len)
  +
| n > len = rotate xs (n-len)
  +
| otherwise = let (f,s) = splitAt n xs in s ++ f
  +
where len = length xs
  +
</haskell>
  +
  +
Without using <hask>length</hask>:
  +
<haskell>
  +
rotate xs n
  +
| n > 0 = (reverse . take n . reverse $ xs) ++ (reverse . drop n . reverse $ xs)
  +
| n <= 0 = (drop (negate n) xs) ++ (take (negate n) xs)
  +
</haskell>
  +
  +
A much simpler solution without using <hask>length</hask> that is very similar to the first solution:
  +
<haskell>
  +
rotate :: [a] -> Int -> [a]
  +
rotate [] _ = []
  +
rotate x 0 = x
  +
rotate x y
  +
| y > 0 = rotate (tail x ++ [head x]) (y-1)
  +
| otherwise = rotate (last x : init x) (y+1)
  +
</haskell>
  +
  +
  +
[[Category:Programming exercise spoilers]]

Revision as of 19:35, 18 January 2014

(**) Rotate a list N places to the left.

Hint: Use the predefined functions length and (++).

rotate [] _ = []
rotate l 0 = l
rotate (x:xs) (n+1) = rotate (xs ++ [x]) n
rotate l n = rotate l (length l + n)

(Note that this solution uses n+k-patterns which are removed from Haskell 2010.)

There are two separate cases:

  • If n > 0, move the first element to the end of the list n times.
  • If n < 0, convert the problem to the equivalent problem for n > 0 by adding the list's length to n.

or using cycle:

rotate xs n = take len . drop (n `mod` len) . cycle $ xs
    where len = length xs

or without mod:

rotate xs n = take (length xs) $ drop (length xs + n) $ cycle xs

or

rotate xs n = if n >= 0 then
                  drop n xs ++ take n xs
              else let l = ((length xs) + n) in
                  drop l xs ++ take l xs

or

rotate xs n | n >= 0 = drop n xs ++ take n xs
            | n < 0 = drop len xs ++ take len xs
                      where len = n+length xs
rotate xs n = drop nn xs ++ take nn xs
    where 
      nn = n `mod` length xs

Using a simple splitAt trick

rotate xs n
    | n < 0 = rotate xs (n+len)
    | n > len = rotate xs (n-len)
    | otherwise = let (f,s) = splitAt n xs in s ++ f
    where len = length xs

Without using length:

rotate xs n
    | n > 0 = (reverse . take n . reverse $ xs) ++ (reverse . drop n . reverse $ xs)
    | n <= 0 = (drop (negate n) xs) ++ (take (negate n) xs)

A much simpler solution without using length that is very similar to the first solution:

rotate :: [a] -> Int -> [a]
rotate [] _ = []
rotate x 0 = x
rotate x y
  | y > 0 = rotate (tail x ++ [head x]) (y-1)
  | otherwise = rotate (last x : init x) (y+1)