Arrow tutorial
From HaskellWiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | <haskell> | |
| + | > module ArrowFun where | ||
| + | > import Control.Arrow | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Arrow a b c represents a process that takes as input something of | ||
| + | type b and outputs something of type c. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Arr builds an arrow out of a function. This function is | ||
| + | arrow-specific. It's signature is | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- arr :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c) -> a b c | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Arrow composition is achieved with (>>>). This takes two arrows | ||
| + | and chains them together, one after another. It is also arrow- | ||
| + | specific. It's signature is: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- (>>>) :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a c d -> a b d | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | First and second make a new arrow out of an existing arrow. They | ||
| + | perform a transformation (given by their argument) on either | ||
| + | the first or the second item of a pair. These definitions are | ||
| + | arrow-specific. Their signatures are: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- first :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a (b, d) (c, d) | ||
| + | > -- second :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a (d, b) (d, c) | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | First and second may seem pretty strange at first, but they'll make sense | ||
| + | in a few minutes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's it for the arrow-specific definitions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let's define a really simple arrow as an example. Our simple arrow is | ||
| + | just a function mapping an input to an output. We don't really need | ||
| + | arrows for something this simple, but we could use something this | ||
| + | simple to explain arrows. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > newtype SimpleFunc a b = SimpleFunc { | ||
| + | > runF :: (a -> b) | ||
| + | > } | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | > instance Arrow SimpleFunc where | ||
| + | > arr f = SimpleFunc f | ||
| + | > first (SimpleFunc f) = SimpleFunc (mapFst f) | ||
| + | > where mapFst g (a,b) = (g a, b) | ||
| + | > second (SimpleFunc f) = SimpleFunc (mapSnd f) | ||
| + | > where mapSnd g (a,b) = (a, g b) | ||
| + | > (SimpleFunc f) >>> (SimpleFunc g) = SimpleFunc (g . f) | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now lets define some operations that are generic to all arrows. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Split is an arrow that splits a single value into a pair of duplicate | ||
| + | values: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > split :: (Arrow a) => a b (b, b) | ||
| + | > split = arr (\x -> (x,x)) | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unsplit is an arrow that takes a pair of values and combines them | ||
| + | to return a single value: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > unsplit :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a (b, c) d | ||
| + | > unsplit = arr . uncurry | ||
| + | > -- arr (\op (x,y) -> x `op` y) | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | (***) combines two arrows into a new arrow by running the two arrows | ||
| + | on a pair of values (one arrow on the first pair and one arrow on the | ||
| + | second pair). | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- f *** g = first f >>> second g | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | (&&&) combines two arrows into a new arrow by running the two arrows on | ||
| + | the same value: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- f &&& g = split >>> first f >>> second g | ||
| + | > -- split >>> f *** g | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | LiftA2 makes a new arrow that combines the output from two arrows using | ||
| + | a binary operation. It works by splitting a value and operating on | ||
| + | both halfs and then combining the result: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > liftA2 :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a e b -> a e c -> a e d | ||
| + | > liftA2 op f g = split >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit op | ||
| + | > -- f &&& g >>> unsplit op | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Now let's build something using our simple arrow definition and | ||
| + | some of the tools we just created. We start with two simple | ||
| + | arrows, f and g. F halves its input and g triples its input and | ||
| + | adds one: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > f, g :: SimpleFunc Int Int | ||
| + | > f = arr (`div` 2) | ||
| + | > g = arr (\x -> x*3 + 1) | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | We can combine these together using liftA2: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > h = liftA2 (+) f g | ||
| + | > hOutput = runF h 8 | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | What is h? How does it work? | ||
| + | The process defined by h is (split >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit (+)). | ||
| + | Lets work through an application of h to some value, 8: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 8 -> (8, 8) split | ||
| + | (8, 8) -> (4, 8) first f (x `div` 2 of the first element) | ||
| + | (4, 8) -> (4, 25) second g (3*x + 1 of the second element) | ||
| + | (4, 25) -> 29 applies (+) to tuple elements. | ||
| + | |||
| + | +------> f --------------+ | ||
| + | | v | ||
| + | 8 ---> (split) ---> g -----> (unsplit (+)) ----> 29 | ||
| + | |||
| + | so we see that h is a new arrow that when applied to 8, applies 8 to f | ||
| + | and applies 8 to g and adds the results. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Let's move on to something a little fancier now: Kleisli arrows. | ||
| + | A Kleisli arrow (Kleisli m a b) is the arrow (a -> m b) for all | ||
| + | monads. It's defined in Control.Arrows similarly to our SimpleFunc: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- newtype Kleisli m a b = Kleisli { | ||
| + | > -- runKleisli :: (a -> m b) | ||
| + | > -- } | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | It comes complete with its own definitions for arr, first, second and | ||
| + | (>>>). This means that all multi-value functions (a -> [b]) are already | ||
| + | defined as Kleisli arrows (because [] is a monad)! (>>>) performs | ||
| + | composition, keeping track of all the multiple results. Split, (&&&) | ||
| + | and (***) are all defined as before. So for example: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > -- XXX I am getting type problems with split, unsplit and liftA2! why? | ||
| + | > split' = arr (\x -> (x,x)) | ||
| + | > unsplit' = arr . uncurry | ||
| + | > --liftA2' :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a e b -> a e c -> a e d | ||
| + | > liftA2' op f g = split' >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit' op | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > plusminus, double, h2 :: Kleisli [] Int Int | ||
| + | > plusminus = Kleisli (\x -> [x, -x]) | ||
| + | > double = arr (* 2) | ||
| + | > h2 = liftA2' (+) plusminus double | ||
| + | > h2Output = runKleisli h2 8 | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Finally, here's a little teaser. There's an arrow function called | ||
| + | returnA which returns an identity arrow. There's a ArrowPlus class | ||
| + | that includes a zeroArrow (which for the list monad is an arrow that | ||
| + | always returns the empty list) and a <+> operator (which takes the | ||
| + | results from two arrows and concatenates them). We can build up | ||
| + | some pretty interesting string transformations (the multi-valued | ||
| + | function String -> [String]) using Kleisli arrows: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <haskell> | ||
| + | > main = do | ||
| + | > let | ||
| + | > prepend x = arr (x ++) | ||
| + | > append x = arr (++ x) | ||
| + | > withId t = returnA <+> t | ||
| + | > xform = (withId $ prepend "<") >>> | ||
| + | > (withId $ append ">") >>> | ||
| + | > (withId $ ((prepend "!") >>> (append "!"))) | ||
| + | > xs = ["test", "foobar"] >>= (runKleisli xform) | ||
| + | > mapM_ putStrLn xs | ||
| + | </haskell> | ||
| + | |||
| + | An important observation here is that | ||
| + | f >> g | ||
| + | |||
| + | is multi-valued composition (g . f), and | ||
| + | (withId f) >>> (withId g) = | ||
| + | (returnA <+> f) >>> (returnA <+> g) = | ||
| + | ((arr id) <+> f) >>> ((arr id) <+> g) | ||
| + | |||
| + | which, when applied to an input x, returns all values: | ||
| + | ((id . id) x) ++ ((id . f) x) ++ ((id . g) x) ++ ((g . f) x) = | ||
| + | x ++ (f x) ++ (g x) ++ ((g . f) x) | ||
| + | |||
| + | which are all permutations of using arrows f and g. | ||
Revision as of 23:31, 19 November 2006
> module ArrowFun where > import Control.Arrow
Arrow a b c represents a process that takes as input something of type b and outputs something of type c.
Arr builds an arrow out of a function. This function is arrow-specific. It's signature is
> -- arr :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c) -> a b c
Arrow composition is achieved with (>>>). This takes two arrows and chains them together, one after another. It is also arrow- specific. It's signature is:
> -- (>>>) :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a c d -> a b d
First and second make a new arrow out of an existing arrow. They perform a transformation (given by their argument) on either the first or the second item of a pair. These definitions are arrow-specific. Their signatures are:
> -- first :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a (b, d) (c, d) > -- second :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a (d, b) (d, c)
First and second may seem pretty strange at first, but they'll make sense in a few minutes.
That's it for the arrow-specific definitions.
Let's define a really simple arrow as an example. Our simple arrow is just a function mapping an input to an output. We don't really need arrows for something this simple, but we could use something this simple to explain arrows.
> newtype SimpleFunc a b = SimpleFunc { > runF :: (a -> b) > } > > instance Arrow SimpleFunc where > arr f = SimpleFunc f > first (SimpleFunc f) = SimpleFunc (mapFst f) > where mapFst g (a,b) = (g a, b) > second (SimpleFunc f) = SimpleFunc (mapSnd f) > where mapSnd g (a,b) = (a, g b) > (SimpleFunc f) >>> (SimpleFunc g) = SimpleFunc (g . f)
Now lets define some operations that are generic to all arrows.
Split is an arrow that splits a single value into a pair of duplicate values:
> split :: (Arrow a) => a b (b, b) > split = arr (\x -> (x,x))
Unsplit is an arrow that takes a pair of values and combines them to return a single value:
> unsplit :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a (b, c) d > unsplit = arr . uncurry > -- arr (\op (x,y) -> x `op` y)
(***) combines two arrows into a new arrow by running the two arrows on a pair of values (one arrow on the first pair and one arrow on the second pair).
> -- f *** g = first f >>> second g
(&&&) combines two arrows into a new arrow by running the two arrows on the same value:
> -- f &&& g = split >>> first f >>> second g > -- split >>> f *** g
LiftA2 makes a new arrow that combines the output from two arrows using a binary operation. It works by splitting a value and operating on both halfs and then combining the result:
> liftA2 :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a e b -> a e c -> a e d > liftA2 op f g = split >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit op > -- f &&& g >>> unsplit op
Now let's build something using our simple arrow definition and some of the tools we just created. We start with two simple arrows, f and g. F halves its input and g triples its input and adds one:
> f, g :: SimpleFunc Int Int > f = arr (`div` 2) > g = arr (\x -> x*3 + 1)
We can combine these together using liftA2:
> h = liftA2 (+) f g > hOutput = runF h 8
What is h? How does it work? The process defined by h is (split >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit (+)). Lets work through an application of h to some value, 8:
8 -> (8, 8) split (8, 8) -> (4, 8) first f (x `div` 2 of the first element) (4, 8) -> (4, 25) second g (3*x + 1 of the second element) (4, 25) -> 29 applies (+) to tuple elements.
+------> f --------------+
| v
8 ---> (split) ---> g -----> (unsplit (+)) ----> 29
so we see that h is a new arrow that when applied to 8, applies 8 to f and applies 8 to g and adds the results.
Let's move on to something a little fancier now: Kleisli arrows.
A Kleisli arrow (Kleisli m a b) is the arrow (a -> m b) for all
monads. It's defined in Control.Arrows similarly to our SimpleFunc:
> -- newtype Kleisli m a b = Kleisli { > -- runKleisli :: (a -> m b) > -- }
It comes complete with its own definitions for arr, first, second and (>>>). This means that all multi-value functions (a -> [b]) are already defined as Kleisli arrows (because [] is a monad)! (>>>) performs composition, keeping track of all the multiple results. Split, (&&&) and (***) are all defined as before. So for example:
> -- XXX I am getting type problems with split, unsplit and liftA2! why? > split' = arr (\x -> (x,x)) > unsplit' = arr . uncurry > --liftA2' :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a e b -> a e c -> a e d > liftA2' op f g = split' >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit' op
> plusminus, double, h2 :: Kleisli [] Int Int > plusminus = Kleisli (\x -> [x, -x]) > double = arr (* 2) > h2 = liftA2' (+) plusminus double > h2Output = runKleisli h2 8
Finally, here's a little teaser. There's an arrow function called returnA which returns an identity arrow. There's a ArrowPlus class that includes a zeroArrow (which for the list monad is an arrow that always returns the empty list) and a <+> operator (which takes the results from two arrows and concatenates them). We can build up some pretty interesting string transformations (the multi-valued function String -> [String]) using Kleisli arrows:
> main = do > let > prepend x = arr (x ++) > append x = arr (++ x) > withId t = returnA <+> t > xform = (withId $ prepend "<") >>> > (withId $ append ">") >>> > (withId $ ((prepend "!") >>> (append "!"))) > xs = ["test", "foobar"] >>= (runKleisli xform) > mapM_ putStrLn xs
An important observation here is that
f >> g
is multi-valued composition (g . f), and
(withId f) >>> (withId g) = (returnA <+> f) >>> (returnA <+> g) = ((arr id) <+> f) >>> ((arr id) <+> g)
which, when applied to an input x, returns all values:
((id . id) x) ++ ((id . f) x) ++ ((id . g) x) ++ ((g . f) x) = x ++ (f x) ++ (g x) ++ ((g . f) x)
which are all permutations of using arrows f and g.
