Arrow tutorial
From HaskellWiki
| Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
> prepend x = arr (x ++) | > prepend x = arr (x ++) | ||
> append x = arr (++ x) | > append x = arr (++ x) | ||
| - | > | + | > withId t = returnA <+> t |
| - | > xform = (prepend "<") >>> | + | > xform = (withId $ prepend "<") >>> |
| - | > (append ">") >>> | + | > (withId $ append ">") >>> |
| - | > (((prepend "!") >>> (append "!"))) | + | > (withId $ ((prepend "!") >>> (append "!"))) |
> xs = ["test", "foobar"] >>= (runKleisli xform) | > xs = ["test", "foobar"] >>= (runKleisli xform) | ||
> mapM_ putStrLn xs | > mapM_ putStrLn xs | ||
| Line 200: | Line 200: | ||
is multi-valued composition (g . f), and | is multi-valued composition (g . f), and | ||
| - | f >>> | + | (withId f) >>> (withId g) = |
(returnA <+> f) >>> (returnA <+> g) = | (returnA <+> f) >>> (returnA <+> g) = | ||
((arr id) <+> f) >>> ((arr id) <+> g) | ((arr id) <+> f) >>> ((arr id) <+> g) | ||
Revision as of 00:47, 20 November 2006
> module ArrowFun where > import Control.Arrow
Contents |
1 The Arrow
Arrow a b c represents a process that takes as input something of type b and outputs something of type c.
Arr builds an arrow out of a function. This function is arrow-specific. It's signature is
arr :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c) -> a b c
Arrow composition is achieved with (>>>). This takes two arrows and chains them together, one after another. It is also arrow- specific. It's signature is:
(>>>) :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a c d -> a b d
First and second make a new arrow out of an existing arrow. They perform a transformation (given by their argument) on either the first or the second item of a pair. These definitions are arrow-specific. Their signatures are:
first :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a (b, d) (c, d) second :: (Arrow a) => a b c -> a (d, b) (d, c)
First and second may seem pretty strange at first, but they'll make sense in a few minutes.
That's it for the arrow-specific definitions.
2 A Simple Arrow
Let's define a really simple arrow as an example. Our simple arrow is just a function mapping an input to an output. We don't really need arrows for something this simple, but we could use something this simple to explain arrows.
> newtype SimpleFunc a b = SimpleFunc { > runF :: (a -> b) > } > > instance Arrow SimpleFunc where > arr f = SimpleFunc f > first (SimpleFunc f) = SimpleFunc (mapFst f) > where mapFst g (a,b) = (g a, b) > second (SimpleFunc f) = SimpleFunc (mapSnd f) > where mapSnd g (a,b) = (a, g b) > (SimpleFunc f) >>> (SimpleFunc g) = SimpleFunc (g . f)
3 Some Arrow Operations
Now lets define some operations that are generic to all arrows.
Split is an arrow that splits a single value into a pair of duplicate values:
> split :: (Arrow a) => a b (b, b) > split = arr (\x -> (x,x))
Unsplit is an arrow that takes a pair of values and combines them to return a single value:
> unsplit :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a (b, c) d > unsplit = arr . uncurry > -- arr (\op (x,y) -> x `op` y)
(***) combines two arrows into a new arrow by running the two arrows on a pair of values (one arrow on the first pair and one arrow on the second pair).
f *** g = first f >>> second g
(&&&) combines two arrows into a new arrow by running the two arrows on the same value:
f &&& g = split >>> first f >>> second g -- = split >>> f *** g
LiftA2 makes a new arrow that combines the output from two arrows using a binary operation. It works by splitting a value and operating on both halfs and then combining the result:
> liftA2 :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a e b -> a e c -> a e d > liftA2 op f g = split >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit op > -- = f &&& g >>> unsplit op
4 An Example
Now let's build something using our simple arrow definition and some of the tools we just created. We start with two simple arrows, f and g. F halves its input and g triples its input and adds one:
> f, g :: SimpleFunc Int Int > f = arr (`div` 2) > g = arr (\x -> x*3 + 1)
We can combine these together using liftA2:
> h = liftA2 (+) f g > hOutput = runF h 8
What is h? How does it work? The process defined by h is (split >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit (+)). Lets work through an application of h to some value, 8:
8 -> (8, 8) split (8, 8) -> (4, 8) first f (x `div` 2 of the first element) (4, 8) -> (4, 25) second g (3*x + 1 of the second element) (4, 25) -> 29 applies (+) to tuple elements.
+------> f --------------+
| v
8 ---> (split) ---> g -----> (unsplit (+)) ----> 29
so we see that h is a new arrow that when applied to 8, applies 8 to f and applies 8 to g and adds the results.
5 Kleisli Arrows
Let's move on to something a little fancier now: Kleisli arrows. A Kleisli arrow (Kleisli m a b) is the arrow (a -> m b) for all monads. It's defined in Control.Arrows similarly to our SimpleFunc:
newtype Kleisli m a b = Kleisli { runKleisli :: (a -> m b) }
It comes complete with its own definitions for arr, first, second and (>>>). This means that all multi-value functions (a -> [b]) are already defined as Kleisli arrows (because [] is a monad)! (>>>) performs composition, keeping track of all the multiple results. Split, (&&&) and (***) are all defined as before. So for example:
> -- XXX I am getting type problems with split, unsplit and liftA2! why? > split' = arr (\x -> (x,x)) > unsplit' = arr . uncurry > --liftA2' :: (Arrow a) => (b -> c -> d) -> a e b -> a e c -> a e d > liftA2' op f g = split' >>> first f >>> second g >>> unsplit' op
> plusminus, double, h2 :: Kleisli [] Int Int > plusminus = Kleisli (\x -> [x, -x]) > double = arr (* 2) > h2 = liftA2' (+) plusminus double > h2Output = runKleisli h2 8
6 A Teaser
Finally, here's a little teaser. There's an arrow function called returnA which returns an identity arrow. There's a ArrowPlus class that includes a zeroArrow (which for the list monad is an arrow that always returns the empty list) and a <+> operator (which takes the results from two arrows and concatenates them). We can build up some pretty interesting string transformations (the multi-valued function String -> [String]) using Kleisli arrows:
> main = do > let > prepend x = arr (x ++) > append x = arr (++ x) > withId t = returnA <+> t > xform = (withId $ prepend "<") >>> > (withId $ append ">") >>> > (withId $ ((prepend "!") >>> (append "!"))) > xs = ["test", "foobar"] >>= (runKleisli xform) > mapM_ putStrLn xs
An important observation here is that
f >>> g
is multi-valued composition (g . f), and
(withId f) >>> (withId g) = (returnA <+> f) >>> (returnA <+> g) = ((arr id) <+> f) >>> ((arr id) <+> g)
which, when applied to an input x, returns all values:
((id . id) x) ++ ((id . f) x) ++ ((id . g) x) ++ ((g . f) x) = x ++ (f x) ++ (g x) ++ ((g . f) x)
which are all permutations of using arrows f and g.
7 Tutorial Meta
- Original version - Nov 19, 2006, Tim Newsham.
