Personal tools

Comparison of functional programming languages

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Haskell compared to other Functional Programming Languages: Heading redundant, category)
m (w/ -> with. We don't need to save bandwidth.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
| static
 
| static
 
| yes
 
| yes
|-
+
|-
  +
! Miranda
  +
| lazy
  +
| lazy lists
  +
| static
  +
| yes
  +
|-
 
! ML
 
! ML
| strict
+
| eager
 
| side-effects
 
| side-effects
 
| static
 
| static
Line 27: Line 27:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Scheme
 
! Scheme
| strict
+
| eager
 
| side-effects
 
| side-effects
 
| dynamic
 
| dynamic
Line 33: Line 33:
 
|-
 
|-
 
! Erlang
 
! Erlang
| strict
+
| eager
 
| side-effects
 
| side-effects
| ?dynamic w/ compiler annotions for static typing
+
| dynamic with compiler annotations for static typing
 
| no
 
| no
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 18:50, 7 February 2013


Evaluation IO Typing Pure
Haskell lazy monads static yes
Clean lazy uniqueness static yes
Miranda lazy lazy lists static yes
ML eager side-effects static no
Scheme eager side-effects dynamic no
Erlang eager side-effects dynamic with compiler annotations for static typing no