Comparison of functional programming languages

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 19:17, 8 October 2006

	Evaluation	IO	Typing	Pure
Haskell	lazy	monads	static	yes
Clean	lazy	uniqueness	static	yes
ML	strict	side-effects	static	no
Scheme	strict	side-effects	dynamic	no
Erlang	strict	side-effects	?dynamic w/ compiler annotions for static typing	no

Revision as of 19:12, 8 October 2006 (edit) BrettGiles (Talk \| contribs) m (Comparison moved to Comparison of functional programming languages) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 19:17, 8 October 2006 (edit) (undo) BrettGiles (Talk \| contribs) m (→Haskell compared to other Functional Programming Languages: Heading redundant, category) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==Haskell compared to other Functional Programming Languages==~~	+	[[Category:Glossary]]

	{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"		{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"