# Foldl as foldr

### From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)

(introduction) |
(foldlMaybe) |
||

Line 18: | Line 18: | ||

We can write a <hask>foldl</hask> that may stop before reaching the end of the input list |
We can write a <hask>foldl</hask> that may stop before reaching the end of the input list |
||

and thus may also terminate on infinite input. |
and thus may also terminate on infinite input. |
||

+ | The function <hask>foldlMaybe</hask> terminates with <hask>Nothing</hask> as result |
||

+ | when it encounters a <hask>Nothing</hask> as interim accumulator result. |
||

+ | <haskell> |
||

+ | foldlMaybe :: (a -> b -> Maybe a) -> a -> [b] -> Maybe a |
||

+ | foldlMaybe f a bs = |
||

+ | foldr (\b g x -> f x b >>= g) Just bs a |
||

+ | </haskell> |
||

+ | |||

[[Category:Idioms]] |
[[Category:Idioms]] |

## Revision as of 22:01, 16 February 2009

When you wonder whether to choose foldl or foldr you may remember,

that bothfoldl

foldl'

foldr

foldr

foldr

foldl

It holds

foldl :: (a -> b -> a) -> a -> [b] -> a foldl f a bs = foldr (\b g x -> g (f x b)) id bs a

Now the question are:

- How can someone find a convolved expression like this?
- How can we benefit from this rewrite?

The answer to the second question is:

We can write afoldl

and thus may also terminate on infinite input.

The functionfoldlMaybe

Nothing

Nothing

foldlMaybe :: (a -> b -> Maybe a) -> a -> [b] -> Maybe a foldlMaybe f a bs = foldr (\b g x -> f x b >>= g) Just bs a