HXT
From HaskellWiki
1 A gentle introduction to the Haskell XML Toolbox
The Haskell XML Toolbox (HXT) is a collection of tools for processing XML with Haskell. The core component of the Haskell XML Toolbox is a domain specific language consisting of a set of combinators for processing XML trees in a simple and elegant way. The combinator library is based on the concept of arrows. The main component is a validating and namespace aware XML-Parser that supports almost fully the XML 1.0 Standard. Extensions are a validator for RelaxNG and an XPath evaluator.
Contents |
2 Background
The Haskell XML Toolbox bases on the ideas of HaXml and HXML but introduces a more general approach for processing XML with Haskell. HXT uses a generic data model for representing XML documents, including the DTD subset, entity references, CData parts and processing instructions. This data model makes it possible to use tree transformation functions as a uniform design of XML processing steps from parsing, DTD processing, entity processing, validation, namespace propagation, content processing and output.
3 Resources
- HXT Home
- hxt-8.2.0.tar.gz
- lastest release
- darcs2.fh-wedel.de/hxt
- darcs repository with head revision of HXT
- Arrow API
- Haddock documentation of head revision with links to source files
- Complete API
- Haddock documentation with arrows and old API based on filters
4 The basic concepts
4.1 The basic data structures
Processing of XML is a task of processing tree structures. This is can be done in Haskell in a very elegant way by defining an appropriate tree data type, a Haskell DOM (document object model) structure. The tree structure in HXT is a rose tree with a special XNode data type for storing the XML node information.
The generally useful tree structure (NTree) is separated from the node type (XNode). This allows for reusing the tree structure and the tree traversal and manipulation functions in other applications.
data NTree a = NTree a [NTree a] -- rose tree data XNode = XText String -- plain text node | ... | XTag QName XmlTrees -- element name and list of attributes | XAttr QName -- attribute name | ... type QName = ... -- qualified name type XmlTree = NTree XNode type XmlTrees = [XmlTree]
4.2 The concept of filters
Selecting, transforming and generating trees often requires routines, which compute not only a single result tree, but a (possibly empty) list of (sub-)trees. This leads to the idea of XML filters like in HaXml. Filters are functions, which take an XML tree as input and compute a list of result trees.
type XmlFilter = XmlTree -> [XmlTree]
More generally we can define a filter as
type Filter a b = a -> [b]
The filter functions are used so frequently, that the idea of defining a domain specific language with filters as the basic processing units comes up. In such a DSL the basic filters are predicates, selectors, constructors and transformers, all working on the HXT DOM tree structure. For a DSL it becomes necessary to define an appropriate set of combinators for building more complex functions from simpler ones. Of course filter composition, like (.) becomes one of the most frequently used combinators. there are more complex filters for traversal of a whole tree and selection or transformation of several nodes. We will see a few first examples in the following part.
The first task is to build filters from pure functions, to define a lift operator. Pure functions are lifted to filters in the following way:
Predicates are lifted by mapping False to the empty list and True to the single element list, containing the input tree.
p :: XmlTree -> Bool -- pure function p t = ... pf :: XmlTree -> [XmlTree] -- or XmlFilter pf t | p t = [t] | otherwise = []
isA :: (a -> Bool) -> (a -> [a]) isA p x | p x = [x] | otherwise = []
A predicate for filtering text nodes looks like this
isXText :: XmlFilter -- XmlTree -> [XmlTree] isXText t@(NTree (XText _) _) = [t] isXText _ = []
Transformers -- functions that map a tree into another tree -- are lifted in a trivial way:
f :: XmlTree -> XmlTree f t = exp(t) ff :: XmlTree -> [XmlTree] ff t = [exp(t)]
Partial functions, functions that can't always compute a result, are usually lifted to totally defined filters:
f :: XmlTree -> XmlTree f t | p t = expr(t) | otherwise = error "f not defined" ff :: XmlFilter ff t | p t = [expr(t)] | otherwise = []
This is a rather comfortable situation, with these filters we don't have to deal with illegal argument errors. Illegal arguments are just mapped to the empty list.
When processing trees, there's often the case, that no, exactly one, or more than one result is possible. These functions, returning a set of results are often a bit imprecisely called nondeterministic functions. These functions, e.g. selecting all children of a node or all grandchildren, are exactly our filters. In this context lists instead of sets of values are the appropriate result type, because the ordering in XML is important and duplicates are possible.
Working with filters is rather similar to working with binary relations, and working with relations is rather natural and comfortable, database people know this very well.
Two first examples for working with nondeterministic functions are selecting the children and the grandchildren of an XmlTree which can be implemented by
getChildren :: XmlFilter getChildren (NTree n cs) = cs getGrandChildren :: XmlFilter getGrandChildren (NTree n cs) = concat [ getChildren c | c <- cs ]
4.3 Filter combinators
Composition of filters (like function composition) is the most important combinator. We will use the infix operator(>>>) :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter -> XmlFilter (f >>> g) t = concat [g t' | t' <- f t]
getGrandChildren :: XmlFilter getGrandChildren = getChildren >>> getChildren
getTextChildren :: XmlFilter getTextChildren = getChildren >>> isXText
(<+>) :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter -> XmlFilter (f <+> g) t = f t ++ g t
Combining elementary filters with (>>>) and (<+>) leads to more complex functionality. For example, selecting all text nodes within two levels of depth (in left to right order) can be formulated with:
getTextChildren2 :: XmlFilter getTextChildren2 = getChildren >>> ( isXText <+> ( getChildren >>> isXText ) )
Exercise: Are these filters equivalent or what's the difference between the two filters?
getChildren >>> ( isXText <+> ( getChildren >>> isXText ) ) ( getChildren >>> isXText ) <+> ( getChildren >>> getChildren >>> isXText )
Of course we need choice combinators. The first idea is an if-then-else filter, built up from three simpler filters. But often it's easier and more elegant to work with simpler binary combinators for choice. So we will introduce the simpler ones first.
One of these choice combinators is calledfollows:
orElse :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter -> XmlFilter orElse f g t | null res1 = g t | otherwise = res1 where res1 = f t
guards :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter -> XmlFilter guards g f t | null (g t) = [] | otherwise = f t when :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter -> XmlFilter when f g t | null (g t) = [t] | otherwise = f t
These choice operators become useful when transforming and manipulating trees.
4.4 Tree traversal filter
A very basic operation on tree structures is the traversal of all nodes and the selection and/or transformation of nodes. These traversal filters serve as control structures for processing whole trees. They correspond to the map and fold combinators for lists.
The simplest traversal filter does a top down search of all nodes with a special feature. This filter, calleddeep :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter deep f = f `orElse` (getChildren >>> deep f)
Example: Selecting all plain text nodes of a document can be formulated with:
deep isXText
Example: Selecting all "top level" tables in a HTML documents looks like this:
deep (isElem >>> hasName "table")
multi :: XmlFilter -> XmlFilter multi f = f <+> (getChildren >>> multi f)
4.5 Arrows
We've already seen, that the filterspowerful and sometimes a more elegant way to process XML than pure function. This is the good news. The bad news is, that filter are not general enough. Of course we sometimes want to do some I/O and we want to stay in the filter level. So we need something like
type XmlIOFilter = XmlTree -> IO [XmlTree]
for working in the IO monad.
Sometimes it's appropriate to thread some state through the computation like in state monads. This leads to a type like
type XmlStateFilter state = state -> XmlTree -> (state, [XmlTree])
And in real world applications we need both extensions at the same time. Of course I/O is necessary but usually there are also some global options and variables for controlling the computations. In HXT, for instance there are variables for controlling trace output, options for setting the default encoding scheme for input data and a base URI for accessing documents, which are addressed in a content or in a DTD part by relative URIs. So we need something like
type XmlIOStateFilter state = state -> XmlTree -> IO (state, [XmlTree])
We want to work with all four filter variants, and in the future perhaps with even more general filters, but of course not with four
sets of filter names, e.g.come in. Classes are needed for overloading names and
not neccessary and hinders reuse in many cases.
A filter discussed above has all features of an arrow. Arrows are introduced for generalising the concept of functions and function combination to more general kinds of computation than pure functions.
A basic set of combinators for arrows is defined in the classes in the
In HXT the additional classes for filters working with lists as result type are
defined inIn HXT there are four types instantiated with these classes for pure list arrows, list arrows with a state, list arrows with IO and list arrows with a state and IO.
newtype LA a b = LA { runLA :: (a -> [b]) } newtype SLA s a b = SLA { runSLA :: (s -> a -> (s, [b])) } newtype IOLA a b = IOLA { runIOLA :: (a -> IO [b]) } newtype IOSLA s a b = IOSLA { runIOSLA :: (s -> a -> IO (s, [b])) }
The first one and the last one are those used most frequently in the toolbox, and of course there are lifting functions for converting general arrows into more specific arrows.
Don't worry about all these conceptual details. Let's have a look into some Hello world examples.
5 Getting started: Hello world examples
5.1 copyXML
The first complete example is a program for copying an XML document
module Main where import Text.XML.HXT.Arrow import System.Environment main :: IO () main = do [src, dst] <- getArgs runX ( readDocument [(a_validate, v_0)] src >>> writeDocument [] dst ) return ()
The interesting part of this example is
the call ofarrow. This arrow is one of the more powerful list arrows with IO and a HXT system state.
The arrow itself is a composition ofvalidation of documents. Its behaviour can be controlled by a list of
options. Here we turn off the validation step. Thename or an URI is read and parsed and a document tree is built. This tree is piped into the output arrow. This one also is controlled by a set of options. Here all the defaults are used.
We've omitted here the boring stuff of option parsing and error handling.
Compilation and a test run looks like this:
hobel > ghc -o copyXml -package hxt CopyXML.hs hobel > cat hello.xml <hello>world</hello> hobel > copyXml hello.xml - <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <hello>world</hello> hobel >
The mini XML document in file hello.xml is read and a document tree is built. Then this tree is converted into a string and written to standard output (filename: -). It is decorated with an XML declaration containing the version and the output encoding.
For processing HTML documents there is a HTML parser, which tries to parse and interprete rather anything as HTML. The HTML parser can be selected by calling
with the appropriate option.
5.2 Pattern for a main program
A more realistic pattern for a simple Unix filter like program has the following structure:
module Main where import Text.XML.HXT.Arrow import System.IO import System.Environment import System.Console.GetOpt import System.Exit main :: IO () main = do argv <- getArgs (al, src, dst) <- cmdlineOpts argv [rc] <- runX (application al src dst) if rc >= c_err then exitWith (ExitFailure (0-1)) else exitWith ExitSuccess -- | the dummy for the boring stuff of option evaluation, -- usually done with 'System.Console.GetOpt' cmdlineOpts :: [String] -> IO (Attributes, String, String) cmdlineOpts argv = return ([(a_validate, v_0)], argv!!0, argv!!1) -- | the main arrow application :: Attributes -> String -> String -> IOSArrow b Int application al src dst = readDocument al src >>> processChildren (processDocumentRootElement `when` isElem) -- (1) >>> writeDocument al dst >>> getErrStatus -- | the dummy for the real processing: the identity filter processDocumentRootElement :: IOSArrow XmlTree XmlTree processDocumentRootElement = this -- substitute this by the real application
This program has the same functionality as our first example, but it separates the arrow from the boring option evaluation and return code computation.
The interesing line is (1).
root node. This root node is a node above the XML document root element. The node above the XML document root element is neccessary because of possible other elements on the same tree level as the XML root, for instance comments, processing instructions or whitespace.
Furthermore the artificial root node serves for storing meta information about the document in the attribute list, like the document name, the encoding scheme, the HTTP transfer headers and other information.
To process the real XML root element, we have to take the children of the root node, select the XML root element and process this, but remain all other children unchanged. This is done with
all children of a node. All results form processing the list of children from the result node.
The structure of internal document tree can be made visible
e.g. by adding the option pairtext representation instead of the real document.
In the next section we will give examples for the
6 Selection examples
6.1 Selecting text from an HTML document
Selecting all the plain text of an XML/HTML document can be formulated with
selectAllText :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree selectAllText = deep isXText
In this case, where the selected nodes are all leaves, these would give the same result.
6.2 Selecting text and ALT attribute values
Let's take a bit more complex task: We want to select all text, but also the values of the alt attributes of image tags.
selectAllTextAndAltValues :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree selectAllTextAndAltValues = deep ( isXText -- (1) <+> ( isElem >>> hasName "img" -- (2) >>> getAttrValue "alt" -- (3) >>> mkText -- (4) ) )
The whole tree is searched for text nodes (1) and for image elements (2), from the image elements the alt attribute values are selected as plain text (3), this text is transformed into a text node (4).
6.3 Selecting text and ALT attribute values (2)
Let's refine the above filter one step further. The text from the alt attributes shall be marked in the output by surrounding double square brackets. Empty alt values shall be ignored.
selectAllTextAndRealAltValues :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree selectAllTextAndRealAltValues = deep ( isXText <+> ( isElem >>> hasName "img" >>> getAttrValue "alt" >>> isA significant -- (1) >>> arr addBrackets -- (2) >>> mkText ) ) where significant :: String -> Bool significant = not . all (`elem` " \n\r\t") addBrackets :: String -> String addBrackets s = " [[ " ++ s ++ " ]] "
This example shows two combinators for building arrows from pure functions.
The first one7 Document construction examples
7.1 The Hello World document
The first document, of course, is a Hello World document:
helloWorld :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree helloWorld = mkelem "html" [] -- (1) [ mkelem "head" [] [ mkelem "title" [] [ txt "Hello World" ] -- (2) ] , mkelem "body" [ sattr "class" "haskell" ] -- (3) [ mkelem "h1" [] [ txt "Hello World" ] -- (4) ] ]
To write this document to a file use the following arrow
root [] [helloWorld] -- (1) >>> writeDocument [(a_indent, v_1)] "hello.xml" -- (2)
document is wrapped into a so called root node (1). This complete document is written to "hello.xml" (2).
a whole document tree with such a root node. Before writing, the document is
indented (text nodes, and an XML declaration with version and encoding is added. If the indent option is not given, the whole document would appears on a single line:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<html>
<head>
<title>Hello World</title>
</head>
<body class="haskell">
<h1>Hello World</h1>
</body>
</html>
The code can be shortened a bit by using some of the convenient functions:
helloWorld2 :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree helloWorld2 = selem "html" [ selem "head" [ selem "title" [ txt "Hello World" ] ] , mkelem "body" [ sattr "class" "haskell" ] [ selem "h1" [ txt "Hello World" ] ] ]
In the above two examples the arrow input is totally ignored, because
of the use of the constant arrow7.2 A page about all images within a HTML page
A bit more interesting task is the construction of a page containing a table of all images within a page inclusive image URLs, geometry and ALT attributes.
The program for this has a frame similar to thebut the rows of the table must be filled in from the input document. In the first step we will generate a table with a single column containing the URL of the image.
imageTable :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree imageTable = selem "html" [ selem "head" [ selem "title" [ txt "Images in Page" ] ] , selem "body" [ selem "h1" [ txt "Images in Page" ] , selem "table" [ collectImages -- (1) >>> genTableRows -- (2) ] ] ] where collectImages -- (1) = deep ( isElem >>> hasName "img" ) genTableRows -- (2) = selem "tr" [ selem "td" [ getAttrValue "src" >>> mkText ] ]
With (1) the image elements are collected, and with (2) the HTML code for an image element is built.
Applied to http://www.haskell.org/ we get the following result (at the time writing this page):
<html>
<head>
<title>Images in Page</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Images in Page</h1>
<table>
<tr>
<td>/haskellwiki_logo.png</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>/sitewiki/images/1/10/Haskelllogo-small.jpg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>/haskellwiki_logo_small.png</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
When generating HTML, often there are constant parts within the page, in the example e.g. the page header. It's possible to write these parts as a string containing plain HTML and then read this with
a simple XML contents parser calledThe example above could then be rewritten as
imageTable
= selem "html"
[ pageHeader
, ...
]
where
pageHeader
= constA "<head><title>Images in Page</title></head>"
>>>
xread
...IO monad, so it can be used in any context, but therefore the error handling
is very limited.7.3 A page about all images within a HTML page: 1. Refinement
The next refinement step is the extension of the table such that it contains four columns, one for the image itself, one for the URL,
the geometry and the ALT text. The extendedhas the following form:
genTableRows = selem "tr" [ selem "td" -- (1) [ this -- (1.1) ] , selem "td" -- (2) [ getAttrValue "src" >>> mkText >>> mkelem "a" -- (2.1) [ attr "href" this ] [ this ] ] , selem "td" -- (3) [ ( getAttrValue "width" &&& -- (3.1) getAttrValue "height" ) >>> arr2 geometry -- (3.2) >>> mkText ] , selem "td" -- (4) [ getAttrValue "alt" >>> mkText ] ] where geometry :: String -> String -> String geometry "" "" = "" geometry w h = w ++ "x" ++ h
(2) is the column from the previous example but the URL has been made active by embedding the URL in an A-element (2.1). In (3) there are two
new combinators,geometry spec. (4) adds the ALT-text.
7.4 A page about all images within a HTML page: 2. Refinement
The generated HTML page is not yet very useful, because it usually contains relative HREFs to the images, so the links do not work. We have to transform the SRC attribute values into absolute URLs. This can be done with the following code:
imageTable2 :: IOStateArrow s XmlTree XmlTree imageTable2 = ... ... , selem "table" [ collectImages >>> mkAbsImageRef -- (1) >>> genTableRows ] ... mkAbsImageRef :: IOStateArrow s XmlTree XmlTree -- (1) mkAbsImageRef = processAttrl ( mkAbsRef -- (2) `when` hasName "src" -- (3) ) where mkAbsRef -- (4) = replaceChildren ( xshow getChildren -- (5) >>> ( mkAbsURI `orElse` this ) -- (6) >>> mkText -- (7) )
(1). This arrow uses the global system state of HXT, in which the base URL of a document is stored. For editing the SRC attribute value, the attribute list
of the image elements is processed withThe resulting String value is converted into a text node forming the new attribute value node (7).
Because of the use of the global HXT state in8 Transformation examples
8.1 Decorating external references of an HTML document
In the following examples, we want to decorate the external references in an HTML page by a small icon, like it's done in many wikis. For this task the document tree has to be traversed, all parts except the intersting A-Elements remain unchanged. At the end of the list of children of an A-Element we add an image element.
Here is the first version:
addRefIcon :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree addRefIcon = processTopDown -- (1) ( addImg -- (2) `when` isExternalRef -- (3) ) where isExternalRef -- (4) = isElem >>> hasName "a" >>> hasAttr "href" >>> getAttrValue "href" >>> isA isExtRef where isExtRef -- (4.1) = isPrefixOf "http:" -- or something more precise addImg = replaceChildren -- (5) ( getChildren -- (6) <+> imgElement -- (7) ) imgElement = mkelem "img" -- (8) [ sattr "src" "/icons/ref.png" -- (9) , sattr "alt" "external ref" ] [] -- (10)
This arrow applies an arrow to all nodes of the whole document tree.
The transformation arrow applies theall A-elements (3),(4). This arrow uses a bit simplified test (4.1) for external URLs.
selecting the current children (6) and adding an image element (7).
The image element is constructed withan element name, a list of arrows for computing the attributes and a list of arrows for computing the contents. The content of the image element is
empty (10). The attributes are constructed withthe name value pair of arguments.
8.2 Transform external references into absolute references
In the following example we will develop a program for editing a HTML page such that all references to external documents (images, hypertext refs, style refs, ...) become absolute references. We will see some new, but very useful combinators in the solution.
The task seems to be rather trivial. In a tree travaersal all references are edited with respect to the document base. But in HTML there is a BASE element, allowed in the content of HEAD with a HREF attribute, which defines the document base. Again this href can be a relative URL.
We start the development with the editing arrow. This gets the real document base as argument.
mkAbsHRefs :: ArrowXml a => String -> a XmlTree XmlTree mkAbsHRefs base = processTopDown editHRef -- (1) where editHRef = processAttrl -- (3) ( changeAttrValue (absHRef base) -- (5) `when` hasName "href" -- (4) ) `when` ( isElem >>> hasName "a" ) -- (2) where absHRef :: String -> String -> String -- (5) absHRef base url = fromMaybe url . expandURIString url $ base
The tree is traversed (1) and for every A element the attribute list is processed (2). All HREF attribute values (4) are manipulated
byan absolut URI. In this first step we only edit A-HREF attribute values. We will refine this later.
The second step is the complete computation of the base URL.
computeBaseRef :: IOStateArrow s XmlTree String computeBaseRef = ( ( ( isElem >>> hasName "html" -- (0) >>> getChildren -- (1) >>> isElem >>> hasName "head" -- (2) >>> getChildren -- (3) >>> isElem >>> hasName "base" -- (4) >>> getAttrValue "href" -- (5) ) &&& getBaseURI -- (6) ) >>> expandURI -- (7) ) `orElse` getBaseURI -- (8)
Input to this arrow is the HTML element, (0) to (5) is the arrow for selecting the BASE elements HREF value, parallel to this the system base URL is read
withof a BASE element. in this case we take the plain document base (8). The selection of the BASE elements is not yet very handy. We will define a more general and elegant function later, allowing an element path as selection argument.
In the third step, we will combine the to arrows. For this we will use
a new combinatoris the following: We need the arrow input (the document) two times, once for computing the document base, and second for editing the whole document, and we want to compute the extra string parameter for editing of course with the above defined arrow.
The combined arrow, our main arrow, looks like this
toAbsRefs :: IOStateArrow s XmlTree XmlTree toAbsRefs = mkAbsHRefs $< computeBaseRef -- (1)
this pattern occurs rather frequently, so ($<) becomes very useful.
Programming with arrows is one style of point free programming. Point free programming often becomes unhandy when values are used more than once.
One solution is the special arrow syntax supported by ghc and others, similar to the do notation for monads. But for many simple cases theis sufficient.
To complete the development of the example, a last step is neccessary: The removal of the redundant BASE element.
toAbsRefs :: IOStateArrow s XmlTree XmlTree toAbsRefs = ( mkAbsHRefs $< computeBaseRef ) >>> removeBaseElement removeBaseElement :: ArrowXml a => a XmlTree XmlTree removeBaseElement = processChildren ( processChildren ( none -- (1) `when` ( isElem >>> hasName "base" ) ) `when` ( isElem >>> hasName "head" ) )
In this function the children of the HEAD element are searched for
a BASE element. This is removed by aplying the null arrowto the input, returning always the empty list.
for selecting the right subtree that is rather common in HXT applications
isElem >>> hasName n1 >>> getChildren >>> isElem >>> hasName n2 ... >>> getChildren >>> isElem >>> hasName nm
For this pattern we will define a convenient function creating the arrow for selection
getDescendents :: ArrowXml a => [String] -> a XmlTree XmlTree getDescendents = foldl1 (\ x y -> x >>> getChildren >>> y) -- (1) . map (\ n -> isElem >>> hasName n) -- (2)
The name list is mapped to the element checking arrow (2),
the resulting list of arrows is folded withand becomes more readable:
computeBaseRef :: IOStateArrow s XmlTree String computeBaseRef = ( ( ( getDescendents ["html","head","base"] -- (1) >>> getAttrValue "href" -- (2) ) ... ...
An even more general and flexible technic are the XPath expressions available for selection of document parts defined in the module
computeBaseRef
= ( ( ( getXPathTrees "/html/head/base" -- (1)
>>>
getAttrValue "href" -- (2)
)
...Even the attribute selection can be expressed by XPath, so (1) and (2) can be combined into
computeBaseRef
= ( ( xshow (getXPathTrees "/html/head/base@href")
...XPath result, an XmlTree, into a string.
XPath defines a full language for selecting parts of an XML document. Sometimes it's rather comfortable to make selections of this type, but the XPath evaluation in general is more expensive in time and space than a simple combination of arrows, like we've
seen it in8.3 Transform external references into absolute references: Refinement
In the above example only A-HREF URLs are edited. Now we extend this to other element-attribute combinations.
mkAbsRefs :: ArrowXml a => String -> a XmlTree XmlTree mkAbsRefs base = processTopDown ( editRef "a" "href" -- (2) >>> editRef "img" "src" -- (3) >>> editRef "link" "href" -- (4) >>> editRef "script" "src" -- (5) ) where editRef en an -- (1) = processAttrl ( changeAttrValue (absHRef base) `when` hasName an ) `when` ( isElem >>> hasName en ) where absHRef :: String -> String -> String absHRef base url = fromMaybe url . expandURIString url $ base
The arrow applied to every element is extended to a sequence of
To process all possible HTML elements, this sequence should be extended by further element-attribute pairs.
This can further be simplified into
mkAbsRefs :: ArrowXml a => String -> a XmlTree XmlTree mkAbsRefs base = processTopDown editRefs where editRefs = foldl (>>>) this . map (\ (en, an) -> editRef en an) $ [ ("a", "href") , ("img", "src") , ("link", "href") , ("script", "src") -- and more ] editRef = ...
so the above code can be simplified to
mkAbsRefs :: ArrowXml a => String -> a XmlTree XmlTree mkAbsRefs base = processTopDown editRefs where editRefs = seqA . map (uncurry editRef) $ ...
9 More complex examples
9.1 Serialization and deserialisation to/from XML
Examples can be found in HXT/Conversion of Haskell data from/to XML
9.2 Practical examples of HXT
More complex and complete examples of HXT in action can be found in HXT/Practical
Categories: Web | XML | Tools | Tutorials
