Personal tools

HaskellWiki talk:Syntax highlighting

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
:An alternative might be to use Unicode more effectively: "foo :: ∀ m a b. (Monad m) ⇒ a → m b". —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 23:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 
:An alternative might be to use Unicode more effectively: "foo :: ∀ m a b. (Monad m) ⇒ a → m b". —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 23:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 
   
 
::If that happens then users will not be able to cut and paste code to try it out. Haskell looks the way Haskell looks, this wiki should embrace that, and help users understand it, not try to change it --[[User:NeilMitchell|Neil Mitchell]] 01:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 
::If that happens then users will not be able to cut and paste code to try it out. Haskell looks the way Haskell looks, this wiki should embrace that, and help users understand it, not try to change it --[[User:NeilMitchell|Neil Mitchell]] 01:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:06, 14 March 2006

Question: Would it be possible to have an markup tag, say <haskell-pretty> which would utilize the <math> environment to produce neat looking things like \operatorname{foo} :: \forall \alpha \beta . \alpha \rightarrow \beta, corresponding to
foo :: forall a b. a -> b
. — asks SebastianSylvan
It may be possible, but there are issues. Bear in mind Haskell type variables can be more than one character:
return :: (Monad monad) => a -> monad a
. I also find the TeX a bit ugly placed in the text.
An alternative might be to use Unicode more effectively: "foo :: ∀ m a b. (Monad m) ⇒ a → m b". —Ashley Y 23:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
If that happens then users will not be able to cut and paste code to try it out. Haskell looks the way Haskell looks, this wiki should embrace that, and help users understand it, not try to change it --Neil Mitchell 01:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)