Difference between revisions of "Haskell and mathematics"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
To paraphrase Hilbert ([http://www.autoren-heute.de/wissenschaft/trans_html/Physiker/index.html "Physics is too complicated for Physicists"]), the relative obscurity of Haskell (a language with a strict notion of functions, higher-order-functions, and types) amongst mathematicians may be that:
 
To paraphrase Hilbert ([http://www.autoren-heute.de/wissenschaft/trans_html/Physiker/index.html "Physics is too complicated for Physicists"]), the relative obscurity of Haskell (a language with a strict notion of functions, higher-order-functions, and types) amongst mathematicians may be that:
:"Haskell is too mathematical for many mathematicians."
+
:"Haskell is too mathematical for many mathematicians." ''[I doubt it. In fact, it seems to me that the opposite is more likely true. -- Cale]''
   
 
This page collects resources for using Haskell to do mathematics:
 
This page collects resources for using Haskell to do mathematics:

Revision as of 01:12, 17 January 2008

Haskell is growing in popularity among mathematicians. As one blogger put it:

"after my involving myself in the subject, one thing that stands out is the relatively low distance between thought expressed in my ordinary day-to-day mathematical discourse, and thought expressed in Haskell code."

and

"How can Haskell not be the programming language that all mathematicians should learn?"

To paraphrase Hilbert ("Physics is too complicated for Physicists"), the relative obscurity of Haskell (a language with a strict notion of functions, higher-order-functions, and types) amongst mathematicians may be that:

"Haskell is too mathematical for many mathematicians." [I doubt it. In fact, it seems to me that the opposite is more likely true. -- Cale]

This page collects resources for using Haskell to do mathematics:

Math papers using Haskell: