Import modules properly

From HaskellWiki

Revision as of 09:38, 6 August 2011

1 Introduction

Haskell has a lot of variants of importing identifiers from other modules. However not all of them are as comfortable as they seem to be at the first glance. We recommend to focus on the following two forms of import:

import qualified Very.Special.Module as VSM
import Another.Important.Module (printf, (<|>), )

instead of

import Very.Special.Module
import Another.Important.Module hiding (open, close, )

There are three different kind of reasons for this.

• Style: If you read
  printf
  ,
  <|>
  or
  VSM.open
  in the program you can find out easily where the identifier comes from. In the second case you don't know if these identifiers are from
  Very.Special.Module
  ,
  Another.Important.Module
  or even other modules. Mind you that grep won't help, because
  Very.Special.Module
  and
  Another.Important.Module
  might just re-export other modules. You might guess the origin of
  printf
  according to its name, but for the infix operator
  <|>
  you will certainly have no idea.
• Compatibility: In the second case, if new identifiers are added to the imported modules they might clash with names of other modules. Thus updating imported modules may break your code. If you import a package A with version a.b.c.d that follows the Package versioning policy then within versions with the same a.b it is allowed to add identifiers. This means that if you import the suggested way, you can safely specify A >= a.b.c && <a.b+1 in your Cabal file. Otherwise you have to chose the smaller range A >= a.b.c && <a.b.c+1. It may also be that
  Another.Important.Module.open
  was deprecated when you hid it, and with a module update removing that identifier, your import fails. That is, an identifier that you never needed but only annoyed you, annoys you again, when it was meant to not bother you any longer! The first variant of import does not suffer from these problems.
• Correctness: I once found a bug in the StorableVector package by converting anonymous imports to explicit imports. I found out that the function
  Foreign.Ptr.plusPtr
  was imported, although functions from this module always have to calculate with unit "element" not "byte". That is,
  advancePtr
  must be used instead. Actually, the
  reverse
  function used
  plusPtr
  and this was wrong. A misbehaviour could only be observed for sub-vectors and elements with size greater than 1 byte. The test suite did miss that.

2 Exception from the rule

Actually if you do not mention Prelude it will be imported anonymously.

3 Clashing of module name abbreviations

In Haskell it is possible to use the same abbreviation for different modules:

import qualified Data.List as List
import qualified Data.List.Extra as List

This is discouraged for the same reasons as above:

Stylistic reason:

The reader of that module has to check these modules in order to find it out.

Compatibility reason:

4 Counter-arguments to explicit import lists

The issue of whether to use explicit import lists is not always clear-cut, however. Here are some reasons you might not want to do this:

• Development is slower: almost every change is accompanied by an import list change, especially if you want to keep your code warning-clean.

• When working on a project with multiple developers, explicit import lists can cause spurious conflicts, since two otherwise-unrelated changes to a file may both require changes to the same import list.

For these reasons amongst others, the GHC project decided to drop the use of explicit import lists. We recommend using explicit import lists when importing from other packages, but not when importing modules within the same package.

Qualified use of identifiers does not suffer from the above problems.

5 See also

• Qualified names

This page addresses an aspect of Haskell style, which is to some extent a matter of taste. Just pick what you find appropriate for you and ignore the rest.

Category: Style