Difference between revisions of "MetaHDBC"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Updated the link to HDBC)
m (Removing ToDo itmes that are done)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
= Tasks =
 
= Tasks =
   
If you are interested in helping out with any of the following task, please [mailto:mads_lindstroem@yahoo.dk contact me]. If you have other tasks, that could help MetaHDBC, it would also be beneficiary to contact me before starting.
+
If you are interested in helping out with any of the following task, please [mailto:mads.lindstroem@gmail.com contact me]. If you have other tasks, that could help MetaHDBC, it would also be beneficiary to contact me before starting.
   
 
== Make popular open source database report type inference result though ODBC ==
 
== Make popular open source database report type inference result though ODBC ==
Line 33: Line 33:
   
 
Currently, we have found no open source database, which satisfy the two requirements above. This is unfortunately as it makes MetaHDBC a lot less valuable.
 
Currently, we have found no open source database, which satisfy the two requirements above. This is unfortunately as it makes MetaHDBC a lot less valuable.
 
 
 
== Testing MetaHDBC on MS Windows ==
 
 
MetaHDBC has only been run on Linux. We would especially like to see MetaHDBC used with MS SQL server, as we expect (hope for) SQL server to have good type inference.
 
 
== Removing the need to patch HDBC ==
 
 
To make MetaHDBC compile we need to patch HDBC. It would be better if did not need this.
 
 
The need can be removed by either making our own binding towards ODBC, or by making a patch that would be acceptable by the HDBC maintainer (John Goerzen). The latter solution would be preferable and we have made two feature request towards HDBC-ODBC, [http://software.complete.org/software/issues/show/73 here] and [http://software.complete.org/software/issues/show/72 here]. However, feature requests is one thing, working maintainable code is another. Please consider implementing the two feature requests in such a way that they could be included in the HDBC-ODBC package. You should, of cause, talk to John Goerzen before implementing these feature requests.
 

Latest revision as of 13:23, 31 July 2011

Short Introduction

MetaHDBC is a project that uses Template Haskell and HDBC to do statically checked database access. The programmer writes ordinary SQL, which is then validated by a relational database management system (RDMS). If the RDMS' ODBC driver supports type inference, then MetaHDBC also makes use of the infered types to do static type checking. Validation and type checking both occurs at compile-time.

Getting started with MetaHDBC

There is no real tutorial about MetaHDBC. Nonetheless, the MetaHDBC draft paper will help you get started. Especially the first few chapters will be good for beginners.

Click here, if you want to install MetaHDBC.

After installation you can look at the examples directory in the repository to get started easily with MetaHDBC.

For a little background, see this haskell-cafe post which got the project started.

Status

MetaHDBC is implemented and can be used, but it has some shortcomings.

MetaHDBC do not implement a SQL (or relational algebra) type inference engine itself. In stead it ask a RDMS (though ODBC) to infer the result of a SQL statement. Unfortunately, popular open source database like PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite do a poor job reporting the type of SQL statements. On the other hand, if you use IBM's DB2, you are in luck as DB2's ODBC driver do a good job of reporting the type of SQL statements. We have not tested MS SQL server's ability to report types of SQL statements, but we suspect it is also good. If you try to use MetaHDBC with MS SQL server, then please report the results.

Second, MetaHDBC have not seen much use, so bugs may be lurking that has yet to be fixed.

Tasks

If you are interested in helping out with any of the following task, please contact me. If you have other tasks, that could help MetaHDBC, it would also be beneficiary to contact me before starting.

Make popular open source database report type inference result though ODBC

For MetaHDBC to shine we need to RDMS's ODBC drivers to:

  • report the type of SQL statements though ODBC, see SQLDescribeParam, SQLDescribeCol, ...
  • we need the reported types to be available before we execute a SQL statement

Currently, we have found no open source database, which satisfy the two requirements above. This is unfortunately as it makes MetaHDBC a lot less valuable.