No import of Prelude

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 18:01, 11 January 2008 (edit) (difference between the methods)← Previous diff Revision as of 02:49, 4 December 2010 (edit) (undo)m (→Question: grammar)Next diff → Line 1: Line 1: == Question == == Question == - Is it possible not to load Prelude module when compiling a Haskell module? + Is it possible to not load the Prelude module when compiling a Haskell module? == Answer == == Answer ==

1 Question

Is it possible to not load the Prelude module when compiling a Haskell module?

You can either do

import Prelude()

{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-}

to the top of the module, or equivalently compile with -fno-implicit-prelude option.

import Prelude()
is less aggressive than NoImplicitPrelude.

E.g. with the first method some functions are imported which are silently inserted for several syntactic constructs.

A bare untyped integral number is rewritten as
fromIntegral num
(so its type will be
Num a => a
),

and list generation syntax is rewritten as follows:

[n..]
$\rightarrow$
enumFrom
,
[n..m]
$\rightarrow$
enumFromTo
,
[n,o..]
$\rightarrow$
enumFromThen
,
[n,o..m]
$\rightarrow$
enumFromThenTo
.

There are some such for which even -fno-implicit-prelude isn't enough; I think these are documented in the "bugs" section of the GHC manual.