Difference between revisions of "Rank-N types"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Encoding of existentials in terms of higher rank types)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Language extensions]]
 
[[Category:Language extensions]]
  +
  +
{{GHCUsersGuide|exts/rank_polymorphism||an Arbitrary Rank Polymorphism section}}
   
 
== About ==
 
== About ==
   
 
Normal Haskell '98 types are considered Rank-1 types. A Haskell '98 type signature such as
 
Normal Haskell '98 types are considered Rank-1 types. A Haskell '98 type signature such as
 
<haskell>a -> b -> a</haskell>
 
<hask>a -> b -> a</hask>
 
 
 
implies that the type variables are universally quantified like so:
 
implies that the type variables are universally quantified like so:
 
<haskell>forall a b. a -> b -> a</haskell>
 
<hask>forall a b. a -> b -> a</hask>
+
<hask>forall</hask> can be floated out of the right-hand side of <hask>-></hask> if it appears there, so:
  +
<haskell>forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> a)</haskell>
 
<hask>forall</hask> can be floated out of the right-hand side of <hask>(->)</hask> if it appears there, so:
 
 
<hask>forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> a)</hask>
 
 
 
is also a Rank-1 type because it is equivalent to the previous signature.
 
is also a Rank-1 type because it is equivalent to the previous signature.
   
Line 27: Line 23:
 
Rank-2 or Rank-N types may be specifically enabled by the language extensions
 
Rank-2 or Rank-N types may be specifically enabled by the language extensions
 
<hask>{-# LANGUAGE Rank2Types #-}</hask> or <hask>{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}</hask>.
 
<hask>{-# LANGUAGE Rank2Types #-}</hask> or <hask>{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}</hask>.
  +
  +
== Church-encoded Lists ==
  +
Church-encoded lists use RankNTypes too, as seen in [http://stackoverflow.com/a/15593349/849891 a StackOverflow answer by sacundim]:
  +
<haskell>
  +
-- | Laws:
  +
--
  +
-- > runList (fromList xs) cons nil == xs
  +
-- > runList (fromList xs) f z == foldr f z xs
  +
-- > foldr f z (toList xs) == runList xs f z
  +
newtype ChurchList a =
  +
ChurchList { runList :: forall r. (a -> r -> r) -> r -> r }
  +
  +
-- | Make a 'ChurchList' out of a regular list.
  +
fromList :: [a] -> ChurchList a
  +
fromList xs = ChurchList $ \k z -> foldr k z xs
  +
  +
-- | Turn a 'ChurchList' into a regular list.
  +
toList :: ChurchList a -> [a]
  +
toList xs = runList xs (:) []
  +
  +
-- | The 'ChurchList' counterpart to '(:)'. Unlike 'DList', whose
  +
-- implementation uses the regular list type, 'ChurchList' abstracts
  +
-- over it as well.
  +
cons :: a -> ChurchList a -> ChurchList a
  +
cons x xs = ChurchList $ \k z -> k x (runList xs k z)
  +
  +
-- | Append two 'ChurchList's. This runs in O(1) time. Note that
  +
-- there is no need to materialize the lists as @[a]@.
  +
append :: ChurchList a -> ChurchList a -> ChurchList a
  +
append xs ys = ChurchList $ \k z -> runList xs k (runList ys k z)
  +
  +
-- i.e.,
  +
  +
nil = {- fromList [] = ChurchList $ \k z -> foldr k z []
  +
= -} ChurchList $ \k z -> z
  +
  +
singleton x = {- cons x nil = ChurchList $ \k z -> k x (runList nil k z)
  +
= -} ChurchList $ \k z -> k x z
  +
  +
snoc xs x = {- append xs $ singleton x
  +
= ChurchList $ \k z -> runList xs k (runList (singleton x) k z)
  +
= -} ChurchList $ \k z -> runList xs k (k x z)
  +
</haskell>
   
 
== Relation to Existentials ==
 
== Relation to Existentials ==
Line 33: Line 72:
   
 
In general, you can replace
 
In general, you can replace
 
<haskell>data T a1 .. ai = forall t1 .. tj. constraints => Constructor e1 .. ek</haskell>
  +
(where <hask>e1..ek</hask> are types in terms of <hask>a1..ai</hask> and <hask>t1..tj</hask>)
   
 
<haskell>Constructor exp1 .. expk -- application of the constructor</haskell>
<hask>data T a1 .. ai = forall t1 .. tj. constraints => Constructor e1 .. ek</hask> (where <hask>e1..ek</hask> are types in terms of <hask>a1..ai</hask> and <hask>t1..tj</hask>)
 
 
<hask>Constructor exp1 .. expk -- application of the constructor</hask>
 
   
<hask>case e of (Constructor pat1 .. patk) -> res</hask>
+
<haskell>case e of (Constructor pat1 .. patk) -> res</haskell>
   
 
with
 
with
   
<hask>data T' a1 .. ai = Constructor' (forall b. (forall t1..tj. constraints => e1 -> e2 -> ... -> ek -> b) -> b)</hask>
+
<haskell>data T' a1 .. ai = Constructor' (forall b. (forall t1..tj. constraints => e1 -> e2 -> ... -> ek -> b) -> b)</haskell>
   
<hask>Constructor' (\f -> f exp1 .. expk)</hask>
+
<haskell>Constructor' (\f -> f exp1 .. expk)</haskell>
   
<hask>case e of (Constructor' f) -> let k pat1 .. patk = res in f k</hask>
+
<haskell>case e of (Constructor' f) -> let k pat1 .. patk = res in f k</haskell>
   
== Also see ==
+
== See also ==
   
[http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/RankNTypes Rank-N types] on the Haskell' website.
+
* [https://gitlab.haskell.org/haskell/prime/-/wikis/RankNTypes Rank-N types] on the [[Haskell']] website.
  +
* {{GHCUsersGuide|exts/rank_polymorphism||a section on Arbitrary Rank Polymorphism}}

Latest revision as of 13:33, 15 April 2024


The GHC Users Guide has an Arbitrary Rank Polymorphism section.

About

Normal Haskell '98 types are considered Rank-1 types. A Haskell '98 type signature such as

a -> b -> a

implies that the type variables are universally quantified like so:

forall a b. a -> b -> a

forall can be floated out of the right-hand side of -> if it appears there, so:

forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> a)

is also a Rank-1 type because it is equivalent to the previous signature.

However, a forall appearing within the left-hand side of (->) cannot be moved up, and therefore forms another level or rank. The type is labeled "Rank-N" where N is the number of foralls which are nested and cannot be merged with a previous one. For example:

(forall a. a -> a) -> (forall b. b -> b)

is a Rank-2 type because the latter forall can be moved to the start but the former one cannot. Therefore, there are two levels of universal quantification.

Rank-N type reconstruction is undecidable in general, and some explicit type annotations are required in their presence.

Rank-2 or Rank-N types may be specifically enabled by the language extensions {-# LANGUAGE Rank2Types #-} or {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}.

Church-encoded Lists

Church-encoded lists use RankNTypes too, as seen in a StackOverflow answer by sacundim:

 
-- | Laws:
--
-- > runList (fromList xs) cons nil == xs
-- > runList (fromList xs) f z == foldr f z xs
-- > foldr f z (toList xs) == runList xs f z
newtype ChurchList a = 
    ChurchList { runList :: forall r. (a -> r -> r) -> r -> r }

-- | Make a 'ChurchList' out of a regular list.
fromList :: [a] -> ChurchList a
fromList xs = ChurchList $ \k z -> foldr k z xs

-- | Turn a 'ChurchList' into a regular list.
toList :: ChurchList a -> [a]
toList xs = runList xs (:) []

-- | The 'ChurchList' counterpart to '(:)'.  Unlike 'DList', whose
-- implementation uses the regular list type, 'ChurchList' abstracts
-- over it as well.
cons :: a -> ChurchList a -> ChurchList a
cons x xs = ChurchList $ \k z -> k x (runList xs k z)

-- | Append two 'ChurchList's.  This runs in O(1) time.  Note that
-- there is no need to materialize the lists as @[a]@.
append :: ChurchList a -> ChurchList a -> ChurchList a
append xs ys = ChurchList $ \k z -> runList xs k (runList ys k z)

-- i.e.,

nil = {- fromList [] = ChurchList $ \k z -> foldr k z []
                  = -} ChurchList $ \k z -> z

singleton x = {- cons x nil = ChurchList $ \k z -> k x (runList nil k z) 
            = -} ChurchList $ \k z -> k x z

snoc xs x = {- append xs $ singleton x
          = ChurchList $ \k z -> runList xs k (runList (singleton x) k z) 
          = -} ChurchList $ \k z -> runList xs k (k x z)

Relation to Existentials

In order to unpack an existential type, you need a polymorphic function that works on any type that could be stored in the existential. This leads to a natural relation between higher-rank types and existentials; and an encoding of existentials in terms of higher rank types in continuation-passing style.

In general, you can replace

data T a1 .. ai = forall t1 .. tj. constraints => Constructor e1 .. ek

(where e1..ek are types in terms of a1..ai and t1..tj)

Constructor exp1 .. expk -- application of the constructor
case e of (Constructor pat1 .. patk) -> res

with

data T' a1 .. ai = Constructor' (forall b. (forall t1..tj. constraints => e1 -> e2 -> ... -> ek -> b) -> b)
Constructor' (\f -> f exp1 .. expk)
case e of (Constructor' f) -> let k pat1 .. patk = res in f k

See also