Difference between revisions of "Syntactic sugar/Pros"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (SyntacticSugar/Pros moved to Syntactic sugar/Pros) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There's lot of advocacy at [[ThingsToAvoid/Discussion]] which may be moved to here. |
There's lot of advocacy at [[ThingsToAvoid/Discussion]] which may be moved to here. |
||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Style]] |
||
| + | [[Category:Syntax]] |
||
Revision as of 11:49, 8 November 2006
This page shall give arguments why syntactic sugar is useful, give examples where it is useful and show why the arguments against syntactic sugar don't matter.
There's lot of advocacy at ThingsToAvoid/Discussion which may be moved to here.