Talk:99 questions/31 to 41

From HaskellWiki
Revision as of 19:24, 17 December 2007 by 3Jane (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Hi,

there are several problems with the solution to 35, given from "Another possibility is .." on.

First: The signature of primefactors is Integer -> [Integer]. That means, the function is designed to work on integers larger than 2^32. (a reasonable task now, when ghc outperforms Fortran). But then we cannot make a list of the primes up to sqrt n. And there are doubts anyway concerning the price for building such a list first.

Second:

a) We first deal with the (possibly multiple) factor 2, then go through the odd numbers as divisors only.

b) factor*factor is computed at each step. We should compute a bound ("intsqrt" below) only once for each "successful" division.


data DivIter = 
    DivIter { dividend :: Integer, 
              divisor  :: Integer,
              bound    :: Integer,
              result   :: [Integer] }

intsqrt m = floor (sqrt $ fromInteger m)

primefactors :: Integer -> [Integer]
primefactors n | n < 2     = []
               | even n    = o2 ++ (primefactors o1)
               | otherwise = if z /=1 then result res ++ [z] else result res
                    where 
                        res = divisions (DivIter { dividend = o1,
                                                   divisor = 3,  
                                                   bound = intsqrt(o1),
                                                   result = o2})
                        z = dividend res  
                               --indeed gets 1 in certain situations
                        (o1, o2) = twosect (n, [])

twosect :: (Integer, [Integer]) -> (Integer, [Integer])
twosect m  | odd (fst m)  = m
           | even (fst m) = twosect ( div (fst m) 2, snd m ++ [2] )

divstep :: DivIter -> DivIter 
divstep y |ximod > 0 = y { divisor=(divisor y) + 2 } 
          |otherwise = y {dividend = xidiv, 
                          bound = intsqrt xidiv, 
                          result = result y ++ [divisor y]}
    where (xidiv, ximod) = divMod (dividend y) (divisor y)

divisions :: DivIter -> DivIter
divisions y |divisor y <= bound y = divisions (divstep y) 
            |otherwise            = y

This computes

  primefactors (2^90+1) = [5,5,13,37,41,61,109,181,1321,54001,29247661]

in a moment, as an equivalent python script does, but fails to beat that script for 2^120+1 - due to the recursion in "divisions". Indeed the function "divisions" is separated from "divstep" here not for readability, but for possible replacement. Compiled with this version:

divisions = do
    y <- get
    if divisor y <= bound y then do
        put ( divstep y )
        divisions
        else 
            return y

called from primefactors by

res = execState divisions (DivIter { dividend = o1, 
                                     divisor = 3, 
                                     bound = intsqrt(o1),
                                     result = o2 })

it computes

   primefactors (2^120+1) = [97,257,673,394783681,4278255361,46908728641]

in about 20 minutes (with a constant footprint of 2MB) on my system, which still is not very good compared with the two hours python needs.