Personal tools

Talk:Comparison of functional programming languages

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I don't know if 'side effects' are the best description of what Erlang uses. Perhaps 'asynchronous messages'? - [[User:MichalPalka|MichalPalka]] 22:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 
I don't know if 'side effects' are the best description of what Erlang uses. Perhaps 'asynchronous messages'? - [[User:MichalPalka|MichalPalka]] 22:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
   
What about OCaml, F#, etc.?
+
What about F#, Erlang etc.?
 
- [[User:Demonkoryu|Demonkoryu]] 09:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 
- [[User:Demonkoryu|Demonkoryu]] 09:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:48, 20 September 2010

Is there a way to point out which languages support the 'opposite' language's paradigms? I.e. Haskell and Clean both allow strictness. ML lets you write lazy code if needed. Just don't want to give the (harmful) impression that you can never get strictness in Haskell, noting that Clean now sells itself as a "strict and lazy" language. -- Don

I don't know if 'side effects' are the best description of what Erlang uses. Perhaps 'asynchronous messages'? - MichalPalka 22:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

What about F#, Erlang etc.? - Demonkoryu 09:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)