Talk:Functor-Applicative-Monad Proposal

From HaskellWiki
Revision as of 20:43, 1 January 2011 by Jesin (talk | contribs) (→‎Pure vs. return: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Fail

fail is useful for the error monad, Either String a.

Pointed

If return is the only method of the Pointed class then Pointed should be included in the hierarchy. Better to be exactly mathematically correct once and for all.

Pure vs. return

When combining pure and return, perhaps we should use the name pure, or something else besides return? It would defy convention, yes, but we would already be making changes that would require a Legacy module for backwards compatability, and it may reduce confusion over what the function actually does, because Haskell's return is nothing like "return" in other languages.