Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell Tutorial for C Programmers"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(asking about splitting the page into one page per section)
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
Okay, it's finally up. Sorry for the wait. I would like some feedback on two items.
I would like some feedback on whether this is too long to be one page. There are natural breaks after each section. Would it be better style if this page was split into separate pages per section? - Eric
 
  +
 
1. Is this tutorial too long to be one page? There are natural breaks after each section. Would it be better style if this page was split into separate pages per section?
  +
  +
2. I kept the section headings, with numbering, from the original form of the tutorial, but they don't match the numbering in the wiki. What would look better, style-wise? Feel free to just remove the "Section I..IV" parts of the section names if that would improve the flow.
  +
  +
- Eric

Latest revision as of 21:13, 28 August 2011

Okay, it's finally up. Sorry for the wait. I would like some feedback on two items.

1. Is this tutorial too long to be one page? There are natural breaks after each section. Would it be better style if this page was split into separate pages per section?

2. I kept the section headings, with numbering, from the original form of the tutorial, but they don't match the numbering in the wiki. What would look better, style-wise? Feel free to just remove the "Section I..IV" parts of the section names if that would improve the flow.

- Eric