Difference between revisions of "Talk:IPhone"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I removed a remark in reference to ''compiling'' embedded languages "A possible problem with the latter approach is that Apple does not allow Apps in the App store that run interpreted code". If the removed remark makes sense to anyone, please let me know. [[User:Conal|Conal]] 20:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 
I removed a remark in reference to ''compiling'' embedded languages "A possible problem with the latter approach is that Apple does not allow Apps in the App store that run interpreted code". If the removed remark makes sense to anyone, please let me know. [[User:Conal|Conal]] 20:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
  +
  +
Using Haskell for App Store apps may not be allowed anymore by the developer agreement? See http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3905 [[User:Subw|Subw]] 08:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  +
: I think [http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/boc3t/does_this_mean_we_cant_use_haskell_for_iphone/c0ns6lp this] reddit comment is appropriate:
  +
: <blockquote>''I doubt Apple will go after anybody except apps generated from Flash, and possibly Mono-Touch. This clause was clearly designed to target Adobe without explicitly naming them. Hell, there are tons of games in the store already that use Lua for scripting levels, and that's clearly against the developer agreement (even the old one) but Apple doesn't seem to care.''"</blockquote>
  +
: I'm not familiar with Apple's policies, but hope this is true. [[User:TomLokhorst|TomLokhorst]] 11:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:35, 9 April 2010

I removed a remark in reference to compiling embedded languages "A possible problem with the latter approach is that Apple does not allow Apps in the App store that run interpreted code". If the removed remark makes sense to anyone, please let me know. Conal 20:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


Using Haskell for App Store apps may not be allowed anymore by the developer agreement? See http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3905 Subw 08:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I think this reddit comment is appropriate:

I doubt Apple will go after anybody except apps generated from Flash, and possibly Mono-Touch. This clause was clearly designed to target Adobe without explicitly naming them. Hell, there are tons of games in the store already that use Lua for scripting levels, and that's clearly against the developer agreement (even the old one) but Apple doesn't seem to care."

I'm not familiar with Apple's policies, but hope this is true. TomLokhorst 11:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)