# Talk:List of partial functions

### From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)

DaniilFrumin (Talk | contribs) (New page: Should we also point out under which circumstances those functions behaviours are undefined? --~~~~) |
|||

(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||

Line 2: | Line 2: | ||

--[[User:DaniilFrumin|DaniilFrumin]] 11:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
--[[User:DaniilFrumin|DaniilFrumin]] 11:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
||

+ | |||

+ | What does it mean to say that ''error'' and ''undefined'' are "not even partial"? As far as I know, a function is either total or partial. If a function is not defined for any point, surely it is partial? |
||

+ | |||

+ | -- Rcaetano |
||

+ | |||

+ | @Rcaetano I meant that they are not defined at any point --- the only purpose of these functions is to signal a pure exception. I don't know what the terminology is for this --- please update with the proper terminology if you know what it is :-) |
||

+ | |||

+ | --[[User:Dave4420|Dave4420]] 16:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC) |

## Latest revision as of 16:45, 13 October 2012

Should we also point out under which circumstances those functions behaviours are undefined?

--DaniilFrumin 11:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

What does it mean to say that *error* and *undefined* are "not even partial"? As far as I know, a function is either total or partial. If a function is not defined for any point, surely it is partial?

-- Rcaetano

@Rcaetano I meant that they are not defined at any point --- the only purpose of these functions is to signal a pure exception. I don't know what the terminology is for this --- please update with the proper terminology if you know what it is :-)

--Dave4420 16:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)