# Talk:Literate programming

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 05:08, 26 September 2008 (edit) (bird style)← Previous diff Revision as of 14:30, 24 August 2010 (edit) (undo) (:: -> \coloncolon)Next diff → Line 2: Line 2: I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047848.html]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. [[User:Tanimoto|tanimoto]] 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC) I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047848.html]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. [[User:Tanimoto|tanimoto]] 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC) + + == :: -> \coloncolon == + + In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package colonequals which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus {::}{{\coloncolon}}1 would replace it with listings. -- [[User:Lambdor|lambdor]] 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

## 1 Bird Style

I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [1]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. tanimoto 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

## 2  :: -> \coloncolon

In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package colonequals which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus {::}Template:\coloncolon1 would replace it with listings. -- lambdor 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)