Personal tools

Talk:Literate programming

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(bird style)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047848.html]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. [[User:Tanimoto|tanimoto]] 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 
I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047848.html]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. [[User:Tanimoto|tanimoto]] 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
== :: -> \coloncolon ==
  +
  +
In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package "colonequals" which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus <nowiki>{::}{{\coloncolon}}1</nowiki> would replace it using listings. Should we add that too? -- [[User:Lambdor|lambdor]] 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:14, 24 August 2010

[edit] 1 Bird Style

I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [1]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. tanimoto 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 2  :: -> \coloncolon

In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package "colonequals" which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus {::}{{\coloncolon}}1 would replace it using listings. Should we add that too? -- lambdor 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)