Personal tools

Talk:Monad

From HaskellWiki

Revision as of 12:51, 11 January 2011 by WillNess (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

About some of that "Functor/Applicative/Monad" business, a little equivalence formula that's worked well for me goes like so:

ap (return f) x == (return . f) =<< x == liftM f x == fmap f x

Just to refresh, (=<<) is the reversed bind. Also, 'ap' is the Monad version of the applicative operator, (<*>) - see the Control.Applicative module for more help.

Usually, I stay away from using liftM, since it's identical to fmap, only confined to Monads, as 'ap' is to (<*>). However, the other liftMn functions are a nice generalization of the zipWithn family to Monads. The benefits of that, I'll leave for another discussion.

BMeph 04:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hope my edit is OK, about Monads as composable computation descriptions whose essence is separation of composition timeline from the run time. That's my hard won insight anyhow. WillNess 12:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)