Difference between revisions of "Talk:Phooey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HaskettCase (talk | contribs) |
HaskettCase (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
This is very interesting. Getting this apparently simple proof of concept working is difficult for me. I've tried on Suse 10.2 and Windows XP. |
This is very interesting. Getting this apparently simple proof of concept working is difficult for me. I've tried on Suse 10.2 and Windows XP. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
wxMSW-2.4.2-setup.zip |
wxMSW-2.4.2-setup.zip |
||
| + | |||
ghc-6-4-bld2.msi |
ghc-6-4-bld2.msi |
||
| + | |||
wxhaskell-bin-msw2.4.2-ghc6.4-0.9.4-1.zip |
wxhaskell-bin-msw2.4.2-ghc6.4-0.9.4-1.zip |
||
| + | |||
The recommended wxwindows 2.4.2 requires a wxhaskell dependent on ghc640. The problem is that arrows require base >=2.0 |
The recommended wxwindows 2.4.2 requires a wxhaskell dependent on ghc640. The problem is that arrows require base >=2.0 |
||
Revision as of 23:25, 20 February 2007
This is very interesting. Getting this apparently simple proof of concept working is difficult for me. I've tried on Suse 10.2 and Windows XP.
files I used on XP:
wxMSW-2.4.2-setup.zip
ghc-6-4-bld2.msi
wxhaskell-bin-msw2.4.2-ghc6.4-0.9.4-1.zip
The recommended wxwindows 2.4.2 requires a wxhaskell dependent on ghc640. The problem is that arrows require base >=2.0
I could update Cabal to 1.1.7 using darcs etc. But I find no instructions
on how to update the base-1.0 which comes with GHC 6.4.0. Even with instructions I think it requires a C compiler or more?