Personal tools

Talk:What a Monad is not

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
==Nicolas Pouillard Comments==
  +
 
I disagree with:
 
I disagree with:
 
"So ordering is not in any way essential to what a monad is."
 
"So ordering is not in any way essential to what a monad is."

Revision as of 21:48, 23 November 2009

Nicolas Pouillard Comments

I disagree with: "So ordering is not in any way essential to what a monad is."

There is commutative monads, great! Other than that the order is important. Moreover there is nothing wrong to see >>= as a sequencing operator.

I also disagree the "IO is impure" paragraph: Indeed only IO will trigger visible side effects, but this is only due to the common evaluation of IO primitives. Moreover I would say that only the runtime system is impure because it does reduce 'main :: IO ()', other than that we are just building a computation plan in a pure way.

Although I agree that the common issue is too mix monad and impurity, and the impurity question is only releated to IO.