Personal tools

User talk:Gwern

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(spam)
(Sysopping: rp)
Line 7: Line 7:
   
 
::[[Special:CheckUser]]. No idea why there's a difference. Also [[Special:Specialpages]] is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::[[Special:CheckUser]]. No idea why there's a difference. Also [[Special:Specialpages]] is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
:::Dunno; the docs definitely say [[Special:Checkuser]],
  +
:::[[Special:Specialpages]] is an old friend of mine; you get it when you go somewhere in the Special: namespace without an existing page, on the error message: 'You have requested an invalid special page, a list of valid special pages may be found at Special:Specialpages.' Our Special:Specialpages ''does not'' list Special:CheckUser, one reason I thought it was non-existent. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 02:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
   
 
== Spam ==
 
== Spam ==

Revision as of 02:56, 14 July 2010

1 Sysopping

Gwern, I have added you to the groups sysop and checkuser.

Thanks. --Gwern 03:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Ashley, is Checkuser installed? I tried Special:Checkuser which is where the MW docs say it should be, but that's an error. --Gwern 04:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Special:CheckUser. No idea why there's a difference. Also Special:Specialpages is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —Ashley Y 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Dunno; the docs definitely say Special:Checkuser,
Special:Specialpages is an old friend of mine; you get it when you go somewhere in the Special: namespace without an existing page, on the error message: 'You have requested an invalid special page, a list of valid special pages may be found at Special:Specialpages.' Our Special:Specialpages does not list Special:CheckUser, one reason I thought it was non-existent. --Gwern 02:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

2 Spam

Hello--just FYI, I noticed a bunch of spam accounts getting created today (User:Buyclomipramine, User:Buyzyvox and the like). I see from some other talk pages that you're already aware of the issue. The folks on #haskell seem to agree that a simple captcha might cut down on such nonsense. The current sign-up procedure is pretty easy, and I don't think it's too much to ask for new contributors to (say) "Use GHCI to find out the type of this Haskell expression" before creating an account :-) Best regards, Wapcaplet 17:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)