Personal tools

User talk:Gwern

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Sysooping)
(rp ha$kell)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Sysooping ==
+
==Sysopping==
  +
Gwern, I have added you to the groups [[Special:Listusers&group=sysop|sysop]] and [[Special:Listusers&group=checkuser|checkuser]].
   
Hi, Gwern
+
:Thanks. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 03:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
   
Agree with all your points, Gwern. Probably I have overreacted, somehow.
+
:Ashley, is Checkuser installed? I tried [[Special:Checkuser]] which is where the MW docs say it should be, but that's an error. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 04:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
And you have, also, noticed the cause and pasted that paragraph, at the bottom of that discussion page: High pression caused by extra short deadlines and overloading, which actually is repeating anually, well, I do not know on what base. The calendar, :) I presume.
 
   
On the other side I did not belive that users with basically no contribution and censorship based activity , will feel a one week blockage as a big problem.
+
::[[Special:CheckUser]]. No idea why there's a difference. Also [[Special:Specialpages]] is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
   
Opening a blog or other site about unethical conduct in Universities, non scientific promotion, plagiarism is a good idea.
+
:::Neither one seems to work. Are you sure we have checkuser working? --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 16:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
   
Thank you and keep in touch,
+
== Spam ==
  +
Hello--just FYI, I noticed a bunch of spam accounts getting created today ([[User:Buyclomipramine]], [[User:Buyzyvox]] and the like). I see from some other talk pages that you're already aware of the issue. The folks on #haskell seem to agree that a simple captcha might cut down on such nonsense. The current sign-up procedure is pretty easy, and I don't think it's too much to ask for new contributors to (say) "Use GHCI to find out the type of this Haskell expression" before creating an account :-) Best regards, [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]] 17:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
   
Dan
+
:Probably. However, I don't have access to that part of the configs - Ashley does. If you want to suggest to Ashley we turn back on either requesting via email accounts or enable CAPTCHAs, then I wouldn't oppose it. However, supposedly they're busy working on an upgrade, so it might be better to let them focus on that. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 02:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
:BTW, it doesn't actually help to revert or blank spam anywhere except the main articlespace. It just clutters up the RCs and makes it harder for me to quickly navigate the forms. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]]
  +
  +
::Duly noted. If it happens again, I'll ignore it unless they replace the main page or any other real content. [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]] 18:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
   
 
==Sysooping ==
 
==Sysooping ==
Line 19: Line 19:
 
Dan
 
Dan
   
==Sysopping==
+
===Sysoping ===
Gwern, I have added you to the groups [[Special:Listusers&group=sysop|sysop]] and [[Special:Listusers&group=checkuser|checkuser]].
 
   
:Thanks. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 03:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
+
Hi, Gwern
   
:Ashley, is Checkuser installed? I tried [[Special:Checkuser]] which is where the MW docs say it should be, but that's an error. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 04:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
+
Agree with all your points, Gwern. Probably I have overreacted, somehow.
  +
And you have, also, noticed the cause and pasted that paragraph, at the bottom of that discussion page: High pression caused by extra short deadlines and overloading, which actually is repeating anually, well, I do not know on what base. The calendar, :) I presume.
   
::[[Special:CheckUser]]. No idea why there's a difference. Also [[Special:Specialpages]] is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
+
On the other side I did not belive that users with basically no contribution and censorship based activity , will feel a one week blockage as a big problem.
   
:::Neither one seems to work. Are you sure we have checkuser working? --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 16:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
+
Opening a blog or other site about unethical conduct in Universities, non scientific promotion, plagiarism is a good idea.
   
== Spam ==
+
Thank you and keep in touch,
Hello--just FYI, I noticed a bunch of spam accounts getting created today ([[User:Buyclomipramine]], [[User:Buyzyvox]] and the like). I see from some other talk pages that you're already aware of the issue. The folks on #haskell seem to agree that a simple captcha might cut down on such nonsense. The current sign-up procedure is pretty easy, and I don't think it's too much to ask for new contributors to (say) "Use GHCI to find out the type of this Haskell expression" before creating an account :-) Best regards, [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]] 17:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 
   
:Probably. However, I don't have access to that part of the configs - Ashley does. If you want to suggest to Ashley we turn back on either requesting via email accounts or enable CAPTCHAs, then I wouldn't oppose it. However, supposedly they're busy working on an upgrade, so it might be better to let them focus on that. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 02:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
+
Dan
   
:BTW, it doesn't actually help to revert or blank spam anywhere except the main articlespace. It just clutters up the RCs and makes it harder for me to quickly navigate the forms. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]]
+
:It may not be a big problem for them but it accomplished its purpose, ending the edit-warring. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 15:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 
::Duly noted. If it happens again, I'll ignore it unless they replace the main page or any other real content. [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]] 18:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 15:38, 21 November 2011

Contents

1 Sysopping

Gwern, I have added you to the groups sysop and checkuser.

Thanks. --Gwern 03:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Ashley, is Checkuser installed? I tried Special:Checkuser which is where the MW docs say it should be, but that's an error. --Gwern 04:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Special:CheckUser. No idea why there's a difference. Also Special:Specialpages is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —Ashley Y 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Neither one seems to work. Are you sure we have checkuser working? --Gwern 16:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

2 Spam

Hello--just FYI, I noticed a bunch of spam accounts getting created today (User:Buyclomipramine, User:Buyzyvox and the like). I see from some other talk pages that you're already aware of the issue. The folks on #haskell seem to agree that a simple captcha might cut down on such nonsense. The current sign-up procedure is pretty easy, and I don't think it's too much to ask for new contributors to (say) "Use GHCI to find out the type of this Haskell expression" before creating an account :-) Best regards, Wapcaplet 17:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Probably. However, I don't have access to that part of the configs - Ashley does. If you want to suggest to Ashley we turn back on either requesting via email accounts or enable CAPTCHAs, then I wouldn't oppose it. However, supposedly they're busy working on an upgrade, so it might be better to let them focus on that. --Gwern 02:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
BTW, it doesn't actually help to revert or blank spam anywhere except the main articlespace. It just clutters up the RCs and makes it harder for me to quickly navigate the forms. --Gwern
Duly noted. If it happens again, I'll ignore it unless they replace the main page or any other real content. Wapcaplet 18:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

3 Sysooping

The Amanoliu user should be blocked for page removal. Thanx Dan

3.1 Sysoping

Hi, Gwern

Agree with all your points, Gwern. Probably I have overreacted, somehow. And you have, also, noticed the cause and pasted that paragraph, at the bottom of that discussion page: High pression caused by extra short deadlines and overloading, which actually is repeating anually, well, I do not know on what base. The calendar, :) I presume.

On the other side I did not belive that users with basically no contribution and censorship based activity , will feel a one week blockage as a big problem.

Opening a blog or other site about unethical conduct in Universities, non scientific promotion, plagiarism is a good idea.

Thank you and keep in touch,

Dan

It may not be a big problem for them but it accomplished its purpose, ending the edit-warring. --Gwern 15:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)