[arch-haskell] parsec troubles
abimelech at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 03:11:41 EST 2010
As a work-around for packages that want parsec 2, as the cabal system allows
multiple versions of a library to be installed, could one just go ahead and
install a parsec 2 and let Cabal packages select that? Perhaps name the
Arch package "parsec2" in the PKGBUILD so it doesn't conflict with parsec 3
when having pacman install it. Or just cabal-install.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Leif Warner <abimelech at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've just been taking the "< 3" requirement for parsec out of .cabal files
> - I've found most things still compile with the new version.
> Is it safe to assume it still works if it compiles, or is there a danger in
> doing this?
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Don Stewart <dons at galois.com> wrote:
>> The version of parsec in [extra] is 3.x, which isn't part of the Haskell
>> This means a lot of stuff doesn't build :/
>> Are there any apps (darcs??) that need parsec3? If not, we should switch
>> to parsec 2
>> -- Don
>> arch-haskell mailing list
>> arch-haskell at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the arch-haskell