[arch-haskell] [jgm at berkeley.edu: Re: Pandoc restriction for Parsec <3]
dons at galois.com
Sat Oct 12 07:36:12 UTC 2013
> On 16/02/10 01:09, Don Stewart wrote:
> > The main user of parsec -- pandoc -- is *not* going to move to parsec 3,
> > since it is twice as slow.
> > That means that neither is the Haskell Platform
> > That means that we should downgrade to parsec 2 on arch and *not move to
> > parsec 3 for the foreseeable future*.
> Is there any plan to still provide parsec 3 in Arch?
I think if we can convince vegai to move haskell-parsec to parsec 2,
then we can add special support for parsec 3.
Then add support to cabal2arch to substitute.
More information about the arch-haskell