[arch-haskell] Re: [extra] haskell-parallel
nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 07:37:38 UTC 2013
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:23:02 +0000, Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 14:19, Peter Simons <simons at cryp.to> wrote:
> > Hi Rémy,
> > > Can you quickly tell me if everybody agrees on me uploading these
> > > packages:
> > >
> > > - haskell-parallel (version 220.127.116.11)
> > > - haskell-hp-parallel (version 18.104.22.168, provides haskell-parallel=22.214.171.124)
> > I'd rather have haskell-parallel-126.96.36.199 in [extra].
> > The distinction between haskell-X and haskell-hp-X sounds good in theory,
> > but I don't believe that the consequences of that change are sufficiently
> > understood, nor am I convinced that we posses a tool-chain that's capable of
> > taking advantage of that distinction. At this point in time, that change
> > looks like a lot of risks and very little payoff.
> I made an attempt at providing exactly this, at
> Please have a look at it and let me know what you find. I'm fairly
> sure those packages need some further tweaking, but my gut feeling
> tells me it *is* possible to do this and end up with a system that is
> convenient to use.
Good work, I'm all for the haskell-hp-* versions, this is a nice tradeoff
between having many versions of each package and only one per package.
This is really a sitution where we have to concile the strict update policy
of the Platform and the "latest released" ArchLinux policy.
More information about the arch-haskell