For one thing it's not available on Hackage. This surely hurts visibility of any Haskell package. It may be the reason it didn't receive so much attention.<div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Krzysztof Skrzętnicki<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 23:31, Michael Serra <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mk.serra@gmail.com">mk.serra@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all,<br> Recently I have been doing the usual beginner's search for the "best GUI toolkit" available to Haskell, and today I installed David Harley's qtHaskell bindings. I was surprised to find they were easy to install (on Linux), and all the examples run flawlessly. So I have two related questions: (1) has anyone out there used qtHaskell, and what was your experience; (2) why do these bindings seem to be a less-popular option than wxwidgets and gtk2hs? I understand qtHaskell is much newer than the others, and so far its development appears to be a one-man operation; other than these obvious explanations, is there a bigger reason people don't seem to be using or discussing QT with Haskell? I would have thought working bindings to such a useful framework would be a bigger deal. <br>
- m. serra<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Beginners mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Beginners@haskell.org">Beginners@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>