<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:34 PM, koomi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:koomi@hackerspace-bamberg.de" target="_blank">koomi@hackerspace-bamberg.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On <a href="tel:21.08.2012%2022" value="+12108201222">21.08.2012 22</a>:43, Brent Yorgey wrote:<br>
> Having more than one $, like (f1 $ f2 $ fn $ arg), is frowned upon.<br>
</div>Care to explain why this is considered bad? I don't see anything wrong<br>
with this.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Experientially, we see it a lot in #xmonad from beginners combining stuff together with a certain amont of cargo-culting (being beginners and usually quite unfamiliar with Haskell).</div>
<div><br></div><div>I've been moving toward using ($) to separate logical "phrases" and (.) within the phrases, to make it easier to see which things go with which. Since layoutHook is rather agglutinative, this helps a lot.</div>
<div><br></div></div>-- <br>brandon s allbery <a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a><br>wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms<br>
<br>
</div>