Dependencies/backwards compatibility in Hackage
bringert at cs.chalmers.se
Thu Feb 1 11:18:46 EST 2007
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Neil Mitchell wrote:
>> We're all assuming here that HaXml deliberately decided to change the
>> interface. Is that really true? (only Malcolm can answer)
> Yes, it's true. Even a non-Malcolm such as myself can answer this,
> because of the magnitude of the changes from 1.13 to 1.17. HaXml is
> somewhere in the process of a big spring cleaning.
> The real question that only Malcolm can answer is how far through the
> process of tidying up it is. That bears on whether it's worth bringing
> haxr up to date; if there's more churn ahead, the answer is probably
> "not yet".
If an experimental HaXml version was added to Hackage, it should be
tagged as such in some way. A cheapo way to do that is to call the
package "HaXml-experimental" or some such.
More information about the cabal-devel