Parsec as a Dependency?
nominolo at googlemail.com
Sun Jun 10 09:44:14 EDT 2007
now that .cabal files are getting a more complex syntax (due to
configurations), I'd really like to use Parsec instead of lots of
hand-written and hard to maintain parsing code. By getting rid of
ReadP-based field parsing, we'd also get proper error messages for
At the Parsec homepage I says that it's now included by default in
GHC, Hugs and NHC, so it'll most likely be present on any sufficiently
What would be arguments against this proposal?
More information about the cabal-devel