Julian Seward (Intl Vendor)
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 03:26:27 -0700
| > I presume when you say gcc-3.0 you really mean gcc-3.0.1 ?
| No. I've heard that 3.0 is buggy, but I already had it=20
| downloaded some time ago. Is 3.0.1 significantly better? Is=20
| anybody else trying to use gcc-3.x with ghc?
3.0.1 has just appeared, and contains 2 months worth of critical
bug fixes over 3.0. One thing I know is that 3.0 could not compile
KDE correctly due to bugs in C++ multiple inheritance, whereas
3.0.1 can. Not that that has anything much to do with the stuff
GHC feeds it. I'm kind-of assuming that 3.0.1 is the first=20
of the 3.X series which is really suitable for widespread use.