GHC 5.00 release update
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
qrczak@knm.org.pl
22 Feb 2001 08:12:10 GMT
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:30:34 +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty <chak@cse.unsw.edu.au> pisze:
> > We don't. It would be silly to allow either static or dynamic
> > bindings, but not both.
>
> Heh? I don't understand what you mean. Do you think that
> we should not support dynamic bindings in where clauses?
Yes. Unless static and dynamic bindings could be mixed in a single
declaration block.
This is also what SimonPJ said.
It would be an inconsistent state. You could add a static binding to
'where' unless there is a dynamic binding there already, in which
case you have to reorganize the function.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak@knm.org.pl http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK