something still wrong with happy?
Malcolm Wallace
Malcolm.Wallace@cs.york.ac.uk
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:25:26 +0100
> > Why is happy being called as 'agc'?
>
> because for some reason, the HAPPY make variable doesn't appear to be
> set. Which is strange, because somehow it must have been set in order
> to build GHC, so I'm mystified. Do you have happy installed? Which
> version?
No, happy is not installed, but it does exist in the build tree.
My config.cache says:
fptools_cv_happy_version=${fptools_cv_happy_version=1.9}
I didn't specifically ask make to build happy this time, but it
may have been built previously. Perhaps I should have used
'make ghc-in-place' to ensure that the in-place happy was used?
My mk/config.mk says
HAPPY =
HAPPY_VERSION = 1.9
which looks bad. Shouldn't the configuration process have filled
in the HAPPY variable with @HappyCmd@ - according to ./configure
HappyCmd=$hardtop/happy/src/happy-inplace;
should do the job?
I just removed config.cache and did a fresh ./configure, and it
reports:
checking for happy... no
checking for version of happy... using happy from the source tree... 1.9
which is rather bizarre to say the least!
Regards,
Malcolm