ghc 6.2 build problem (MinGW/MSYS)
simonpj at microsoft.com
Mon Jan 5 13:14:18 EST 2004
| I'd suggest using an anonymous cvs checkout instead of a tarball if
| It makes integration of your changes easier because you can provide
| against the current system instead of a snapshot which is increasingly
Yes I strongly agree. If we agree that something should be fixed in the
main tree, we can do so and then you can pick up the changes via CVS.
If we agree that all your fixes should go in the tree, it's much easier
if you give us diffs relative to the most up-to-date tree.
More information about the Cvs-ghc