[Fwd: Re: [Haskell] hscpp]

[Simon Marlow]

Yes, with a couple of caveats:

 - test performance first
 - if a BSD-licensed CPP turns up, we might consider using that instead

Cheers,
	Simon

On 28 September 2004 17:50, Sven Panne wrote:

> That reminds me of the fact that we should probably include hscpp in
> our GHC from HEAD...
> 
> Cheers,
>     S.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Haskell] hscpp
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:51:50 +0100
> From: Malcolm Wallace <Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk>
> Organization: Dept of Computer Science, University of York
> To: haskell at haskell.org
> References: <200409272318.29550.wolfgang at jeltsch.net>
> 
> Wolfgang Jeltsch <wolfgang at jeltsch.net> writes:
> 
>> there was some discussion about a Haskell-friendly CPP a while ago. 
>> What happend to this project?  I desperately need such a
>> preprocessor. 
> 
> It is called cpphs, and is currently at version 0.7.  I think it
> is feature-complete now, and has behaviour highly compatible with
> cpp -traditional.  In particular, it avoids the problems introduced
> in gcc-3.x's cpp.
> 
>      http://haskell.org/cpphs/
> 
> Regards,
>      Malcolm
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell mailing list
> Haskell at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc