patch applied (ghc): q
simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 05:05:33 EST 2006
I'm switching to non-partial repositories for most of my GHC trees now. This
way I avoid the whole class of get_extra failures, which seem to be cropping up
quite a lot these days. To start, you can grab:
And then pull into that tree. Doing 'darcs get' without --partial probably
won't work on Windows because some of the patches interact badly with
case-insensitive file systems.
Non-partial trees aren't so bad: you only need to download the whole thing once,
then you can just copy it to make new trees. Don't 'darcs get' on Windows,
again due to the case-insensitivity problem, but definitely *do* 'darcs get' on
Unix, because it'll share the patch files between the two trees.
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Sorry. I mis-typed. Then I tried to un-record the patch I had recorded. Darcs crashed (log below).
> Since I cannot un-record it, all I could do was to push it.
> Anyway, it's a small change fixing a bug in TcSimplify that mixed up implication constraints and implicit parameters; it fixes one of the two bugs reported in Trac #1033
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: cvs-all-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:cvs-all-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Lemmih
> | Sent: 01 December 2006 15:28
> | To: Simon Peyton-Jones
> | Cc: cvs-ghc at haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: patch applied (ghc): q
> | On 12/1/06, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> | > Thu Nov 30 19:42:07 PST 2006 simonpj at microsoft.com
> | > * q
> | >
> | > M ./compiler/typecheck/Inst.lhs -1 +3
> | > M ./compiler/typecheck/TcSimplify.lhs -4 +1
> | q?
> sh-2.04$ darcs unrecord
> Fri Dec 1 03:42:07 GMT Standard Time 2006 simonpj at microsoft.com
> * q
> Shall I unrecord this patch? (1/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: y
> Wed Nov 29 22:52:43 GMT Standard Time 2006 simonpj at microsoft.com
> * Remove trace
> Shall I unrecord this patch? (2/1121) [ynWvpxqadjk], or ? for help: d
> darcs.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra:
> Fri Apr 7 11:18:39 GMT Standard Time 2006 Simon Marlow <simonmar at microsoft.com>
> * Fix a bug related to threads blocked on blackholes
> We weren't making them live early enough, with the result that
> finalizable objects referred to only by a thread blocked on a black
> hole could be finalized too early (see conc057 test).
> Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository?
More information about the Cvs-ghc