Windows-native GHC
Bulat Ziganshin
bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com
Wed Nov 15 13:12:00 EST 2006
Hello Simon,
Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
>>>The reason for this was that I was assuming porting the mangler to understand
>>>MASM syntax would be a huge effort. However, if we can use YASM or something
>>>else with GAS syntax, it might be feasible. Still, going NCG-only is the
>>>preferred solution, and it's the direction we want to move in.
>>
>>
>> well, while C compilers generate better code - please try to support
>> them. in this particular case, -fvia-C will make accessible both MS
>> and Intel compilers, and the latter is the best C compiler at the
>> moment
> It'll need a *lot* of work in the mangler (that horrible Perl script) to support
> mangling the output from the MS/Intel compilers.
i interpreted your words above as "we don't need to change mangler to
support new compiler". if this needs a work, we shouldn't done it -
afaiu, main users request is support of object code linking with MS
compilers, not any speed breakthroughs
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list