Checkins and test passing

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello Malcolm,

Monday, October 23, 2006, 1:57:38 PM, you wrote:

>> I think it would be a nice requirement that for a test to be marked as
>> expected-to-fail there must be an open bug about it.
> If the "expected/unexpected" terminology is confusing, then maybe it
> would be better to rename them to "desired/undesired" failures?

it seems that we need 3 classes :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com