simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Wed Aug 8 11:19:29 EDT 2007
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> An automated system would be cool, but it'd require some effort to set
> up. In the meantime, we should probably go with SimonM's proposal and
> just make GHC use a subset-branch of the main Cabal repo. Pulling
> changes over into GHC's Cabal branch would be a manual process, which
> would involve running validate. Especially, if, as you wrote, you guys
> are currently looking at breaking changes, that would be fairly urgent.
> I'd rather not have another round of the GHC build breaking every week.
I've just made GHC's Cabal into a branch. The main Cabal repo is
and GHC's branch is
(the latter used to be a symbolic link to the former, now they're separate
repos). Can Cabal developers check that they're using the main Cabal repo
when pushing, please?
More information about the Cvs-ghc