Invalid!
Simon Marlow
simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 09:23:28 EST 2007
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Pepe,
>> But no, I did push the patch after all.
>> Manuel, does validate still fail there ?
>> Do you have the patch below?
>>
>> Sun Dec 9 10:21:41 PST 2007 Pepe Iborra <mnislaih at gmail.com>
>> * Adapt to changes in :print (contents of references)
>>
>> M ./tests/ghc-regress/ghci.debugger/scripts/print028.stdout -2 +3
>>
>
> It's ok now - I probably pulled before you pushed to the test suite.
>
> Todays failure is
>
> Unexpected failures:
> haddock.Test(normal)
It looks like mainly formatting differences, so I accepted the output.
Meanwhile there are a bunch of test failures on the stable branch, I've
fixed some of them, but we're left with
Unexpected failures:
GADT4(normal)
GADT5(normal)
GADT6(normal)
InstEqContext2(normal)
gadt21(normal)
should these be marked as expected failures on the 6.8 branch?
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list