Invalid!

Simon Marlow simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 09:23:28 EST 2007


Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> Pepe,
>> But no, I did push the patch after all.
>> Manuel, does validate still fail there ?
>> Do you have the patch below?
>>
>> Sun Dec  9 10:21:41 PST 2007  Pepe Iborra <mnislaih at gmail.com>
>> * Adapt to changes in :print (contents of references)
>>
>>   M ./tests/ghc-regress/ghci.debugger/scripts/print028.stdout -2 +3
>>
> 
> It's ok now - I probably pulled before you pushed to the test suite.
> 
> Todays failure is
> 
>   Unexpected failures:
>      haddock.Test(normal)

It looks like mainly formatting differences, so I accepted the output.

Meanwhile there are a bunch of test failures on the stable branch, I've 
fixed some of them, but we're left with

Unexpected failures:
    GADT4(normal)
    GADT5(normal)
    GADT6(normal)
    InstEqContext2(normal)
    gadt21(normal)

should these be marked as expected failures on the 6.8 branch?

Cheers,
	Simon



More information about the Cvs-ghc mailing list