Invalid!
Manuel M T Chakravarty
chak at cse.unsw.edu.au
Thu Dec 13 02:38:09 EST 2007
Simon Marlow:
> Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>> Pepe,
>>> But no, I did push the patch after all.
>>> Manuel, does validate still fail there ?
>>> Do you have the patch below?
>>>
>>> Sun Dec 9 10:21:41 PST 2007 Pepe Iborra <mnislaih at gmail.com>
>>> * Adapt to changes in :print (contents of references)
>>>
>>> M ./tests/ghc-regress/ghci.debugger/scripts/print028.stdout -2 +3
>>>
>> It's ok now - I probably pulled before you pushed to the test suite.
>> Todays failure is
>> Unexpected failures:
>> haddock.Test(normal)
>
> It looks like mainly formatting differences, so I accepted the output.
>
> Meanwhile there are a bunch of test failures on the stable branch,
> I've fixed some of them, but we're left with
>
> Unexpected failures:
> GADT4(normal)
> GADT5(normal)
> GADT6(normal)
> InstEqContext2(normal)
> gadt21(normal)
>
> should these be marked as expected failures on the 6.8 branch?
I started marking them as such, but there are also some others relate
to recent changes in the type checker it seems. I'll take care of
those.
Manuel
More information about the Cvs-ghc
mailing list