Your message to Cvs-ghc awaits moderator approval

[Claus Reinke]

Hi Ian,

>> i assume the match filter looks for the subjects created
>> by 'darcs send'?
> Yes, for subjects starting "darcs patch".

ok, simple enough - i'll try to remember that next time
(perhaps add a tip to workingconventions: bug/feature?)
 
>> but i tend to use 'darcs send -o file' so
>> that i can (a) add comments,
> darcs send --edit-description

that will edit the patch description. apart from that getting
burried in the email attachment, i often need to add
comments referring to the ticket review thread, most of
which belong only in the thread, not the ticket description.
 
>> - could one of the moderators please free this one?
> Done.

thanks.
 
>>    or this list is not for patches, then the bounce 
>>    message should say so
> 
> As far as I know we can't change the bounce message.

urgh. 'bounce message' leads to the wrong search results,
anyway, and there seem to be separate text templates for
different reject/hold reasons, but apparently those aren't
list-specific (yet)? the topic appears in several mailman
threads, with temporary workarounds, and much hope 
for mailman 2.2..
 
>> assuming that this still is the list where occasional
>> contributors can send patches, perhaps the list filter
>> could pass the message on without attachment and 
>> the attachment could be retrieved from the list archive?
> 
> As far as I know we can't do that either (and unless we can put a link
> to the archive in the message it would be a pain anyway).

there's always an archive link with each message, but
i suspect that anything filtered from the list will also be
filtered from the archive.
 
thanks,
claus