[nightly] 10-Aug-2008 build of HEAD on i386-unknown-linux
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Mon Aug 11 08:07:46 EDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 12:27 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | I think we should not build the non-core libs with -Werror. It makes
> | perfect sense for the core libs where the ghc team effectively maintains
> | them, but not for non-core ones.
> But time *is* a core lib. Similarly containers, pretty, filepath,
> directory... The full list is below.
That list indicates that "old-time" is a core lib but "time" is not.
> GHC is simply a client for these libraries. Should they have -Werror
> or not? I'm not sure.
I'm not sure either for those core libs that have external maintainers
like filepath etc, but for non-core like "time" it'd be much easier for
you without -Werror.
> utils/hsc2hs hsc2hs
> libraries/array packages/array
> libraries/base packages/base
> libraries/bytestring packages/bytestring
> libraries/Cabal packages/Cabal
> libraries/containers packages/containers
> libraries/directory packages/directory
> libraries/editline packages/editline
> libraries/filepath packages/filepath
> libraries/ghc-prim packages/ghc-prim
> libraries/haskell98 packages/haskell98
> libraries/hpc packages/hpc
> libraries/integer-gmp packages/integer-gmp
> libraries/old-locale packages/old-locale
> libraries/old-time packages/old-time
but no "time"
> libraries/packedstring packages/packedstring
> libraries/pretty packages/pretty
> libraries/process packages/process
> libraries/random packages/random
> libraries/template-haskell packages/template-haskell
> libraries/unix packages/unix
> libraries/Win32 packages/Win32
More information about the Cvs-ghc