After enjoying a working GHC HEAD build for a few days...
simonpj at microsoft.com
Thu Aug 21 03:27:44 EDT 2008
I suspect that is my fault, although I did validate. I will check
Ian: could validate continue after a Haddock failure, and simply report it along with other test failures? That would stop a Haddock failure completely borking the validate run. Or would that be hard?
| -----Original Message-----
| From: cvs-ghc-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:cvs-ghc-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Manuel M T
| Sent: 21 August 2008 03:20
| To: cvs-ghc at haskell.org
| Subject: After enjoying a working GHC HEAD build for a few days...
| ...I know get:
| Registering ghc-6.9...
| Reading package info from "dist-stage2/inplace-pkg-config" ... done.
| Writing new package config file... done.
| make -C compiler stage=2 doc
| /Users/chak/Code/ghc-test/libraries/cabal-bin /opt/local/bin/ghc /
| Users/chak/Code/ghc-test/libraries/bootstrapping.conf haddock --
| distpref dist-stage2
| Preprocessing library ghc-6.9...
| Running Haddock for ghc-6.9...
| dist-stage2/build/tmp/typecheck/TcGenDeriv.hs: 1300:41: Parse error
| make: *** [doc.stage.2] Error 1
| make: *** [stage2] Error 2
| make: *** [bootstrap2] Error 2
| TacticalGrace chak 4 (.../Code/ghc-test):
| What a pity!
| PS: This is running validate on Mac OS X. I don't care about haddock,
| I just want to validate the ghc build...
| Cvs-ghc mailing list
| Cvs-ghc at haskell.org
More information about the Cvs-ghc