patch applied (ghc): Add assertion for arity match (checks Trac
marlowsd at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 10:20:38 EST 2008
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>> | Hooray for the testsuite and validate: out of 2000+ tests, there was
>> | exactly 1 (ONE) that demonstrated this bug, and it was in a test for
>> | System.Random library of all things. This serves as a reminder to
>> all of
>> | us: any test failure should be treated as suspicious, even if it
>> | look at all related to something you changed, and this is exactly
>> why we
>> | have to keep validate clean. I am now a fully paid-up validate
>> On Windows (MSYS) I get several failures that I'm pretty sure have
>> been there for a while. They seem to relate to things like 'printf'
>> not existing. That makes it harder to interpret a Windows validate run.
>> I wonder if someone (Neil? Ian?) might investigate?
> I see some, but not all of those failures on our buildbots, I'll
> investigate. We had zero failures a few days ago, so I think these are
Well, on closer inspection we currently have zero failures on the Cygwin
buildbots, for the fast/validate testsuite. I don't have an MSYS build set
up, so could someone else try with that?
More information about the Cvs-ghc